Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria, 09042, Monserrato, CA, Italy.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024 May 26;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13002-024-00697-6.
In answer to the debate question "Is ethnobiology romanticizing traditional practices, posing an urgent need for more experimental studies evaluating local knowledge systems?" I suggest to follow-up on field study results adopting an inclusive research agenda, and challenge descriptive data, theories, and hypotheses by means of experiments. Traditional and local knowledge are generally associated with positive societal values by ethnobiologists and, increasingly also by stakeholders. They are seen as a way for improving local livelihoods, biocultural diversity conservation and for promoting sustainable development. Therefore, it is argued that such knowledge needs to be documented, protected, conserved in situ, and investigated by hypothesis testing. Here I argue that a critical mindset is needed when assessing any kind of knowledge, whether it is modern, local, indigenous, or traditional.
针对“民族生物学是否在美化传统实践,迫切需要更多的实验研究来评估当地知识体系?”这一辩论问题,我建议在后续的实地研究结果中采用包容性的研究议程,并通过实验来挑战描述性数据、理论和假设。民族生物学家越来越多地认为,传统和当地知识通常与积极的社会价值观相关联,它们被视为改善当地生计、生物文化多样性保护和促进可持续发展的一种途径。因此,有人认为,有必要通过假设检验来记录、保护、原地保护和调查这些知识。在这里,我认为在评估任何形式的知识时,无论是现代的、本地的、土著的还是传统的,都需要批判性思维。