Suppr超能文献

肝病门诊对酒精使用障碍慢性肝病患者的简短干预:效果与局限

Brief intervention for chronic liver disease patients with alcohol use disorder in a hepatology outpatient unit: Effects and limitations.

作者信息

Hara Nagisa, Hiraoka Atsushi, Nakai Masato, Shiraki Makoto, Namisaki Tadashi, Miyaaki Hisamitsu, Hisanaga Takuro, Takahashi Hirokazu, Ohama Hideko, Tada Fujimasa, Sakamoto Naoya, Nakao Kazuhiko, Takami Taro, Eguchi Yuichiro, Yoshiji Hitoshi

机构信息

Liver Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.

Department of Nutrition, Eguchi Hospital, Saga, Japan.

出版信息

Hepatol Res. 2024 Nov;54(11):1099-1105. doi: 10.1111/hepr.14060. Epub 2024 May 27.

Abstract

AIM

It is not uncommon to encounter outpatients in the hepatology department with harmful alcohol habits. When treating such chronic liver disease (CLD) patients, an adequate intervention method for harm reduction of alcohol use, such as brief intervention (BI) or BI and nalmefene, should be considered. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical effectiveness of BI for CLD patients affected by harmful alcohol use.

METHODS

From June 2021 to 2023, 123 Japanese CLD outpatients (hepatitis B virus : hepatitis C virus : alcoholic liver disease : others = 32:18:42:31) with an Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score of ≥8 at the initial interview and a repeat interview with AUDIT 9 months later were enrolled. Clinical features related to patient behavior following the initial AUDIT interview were retrospectively evaluated, and compared between patients without and with BI treatment.

RESULTS

For the non-BI and BI groups, baseline AUDIT score (median 10 [interquartile range (IQR) 9-13] vs. 12 [IQR 10-17], p = 0.016) and relative change in AUDIT score (median 0 [IQR -3 to 2] vs. -3 [IQR -7 to 0], p < 0.01) showed significant differences, whereas there was no significant difference between the groups for AUDIT score at the time of the second interview (p = 0.156). Following BI, significant improvements were observed for items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, and 10 of AUDIT (each p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with an alcohol use disorder as well as those with alcohol dependency who received BI showed a significant decline in AUDIT score, although the score of the follow-up AUDIT indicated continued alcohol use disorder. In addition to BI, medication with nalmefene should be considered, based on individual factors.

摘要

目的

肝病科门诊中不乏有有害饮酒习惯的患者。在治疗这类慢性肝病(CLD)患者时,应考虑采用适当的减少酒精使用危害的干预方法,如简短干预(BI)或BI联合纳美芬。本研究旨在阐明BI对受有害酒精使用影响的CLD患者的临床疗效。

方法

2021年6月至2023年,纳入123例日本CLD门诊患者(乙肝病毒:丙肝病毒:酒精性肝病:其他=32:18:42:31),初诊时酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)评分≥8,9个月后重复进行AUDIT访谈。回顾性评估初次AUDIT访谈后与患者行为相关的临床特征,并在未接受BI治疗和接受BI治疗的患者之间进行比较。

结果

非BI组和BI组的基线AUDIT评分(中位数10[四分位间距(IQR)9 - 13]对12[IQR 10 - 17],p = 0.016)和AUDIT评分的相对变化(中位数0[IQR - 3至2]对 - 3[IQR - 7至0],p < 0.01)显示出显著差异,而第二次访谈时两组的AUDIT评分无显著差异(p = 0.156)。BI治疗后,AUDIT的第1、2、3、4、5、8和10项有显著改善(各p < 0.05)。

结论

接受BI的酒精使用障碍患者以及酒精依赖患者的AUDIT评分显著下降,尽管随访AUDIT评分表明仍存在酒精使用障碍。除BI外,应根据个体因素考虑使用纳美芬进行药物治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验