Rodre Sara, Sturup Joakim, Masterman Thomas
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Huddinge, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Med Sci Law. 2025 Apr;65(2):98-112. doi: 10.1177/00258024241255779. Epub 2024 May 27.
In Sweden, from 1990 to 2013, most homicides occurred between family members, friends or acquaintances: the annual rate of incidents between unacquainted offenders and victims ranged between 8% and 13%. In the majority of these "stranger homicides," three common motives, as defined by the precipitating event, could be identified: homicides resulting from a spontaneous altercation; homicides committed in the context of a robbery or burglary; and homicides committed in the context of a gangland conflict. The remaining minority-with uncommon or indiscernible motives-could, nonetheless, be categorized according to their nonconventional distinguishing feature: homicides characterized by the offender's ostensibly mentally aberrant behavior; homicides committed in the context of a hate offense or politically motivated offense; homicides committed in the context of a sexual offense; and homicides committed in the context of a mass killing or series of homicides. In this registry-based study of 224 incidents, "conventional" stranger homicides, defined by their commonplace motive, were compared with "nonconventional" stranger homicides, defined by their lack of such motive. The former were more often committed with an accomplice, against a male victim, whereas the latter were more often committed in a public place, after contact initiated by the offender. In the latter, offenders were less often intoxicated at the time of the offense and more often adjudged to suffer from a severe mental disorder. The subcategory of nonconventional stranger homicides characterized by the offender's ostensibly mentally aberrant behavior corresponded largely to both the archetypal stranger-homicide construct and the popular notion "act of madness."
在瑞典,1990年至2013年期间,大多数杀人案件发生在家庭成员、朋友或熟人之间:陌生犯罪者与受害者之间的年发生率在8%至13%之间。在大多数这些“陌生人杀人案”中,根据引发事件可确定三种常见动机:由自发争吵导致的杀人案;在抢劫或入室盗窃背景下实施的杀人案;以及在黑帮冲突背景下实施的杀人案。其余少数动机不常见或难以辨别的案件,尽管如此,可根据其非常规的显著特征进行分类:以犯罪者表面上精神异常行为为特征的杀人案;在仇恨犯罪或出于政治动机的犯罪背景下实施的杀人案;在性犯罪背景下实施的杀人案;以及在大规模杀戮或一系列杀人案背景下实施的杀人案。在这项基于登记册的对224起事件的研究中,将由常见动机定义的“常规”陌生人杀人案与因缺乏此类动机而定义的“非常规”陌生人杀人案进行了比较。前者更常与同伙一起实施,受害者为男性,而后者更常在公共场所实施,由犯罪者发起接触之后。在后者中,犯罪者在犯罪时较少处于醉酒状态,且更常被判定患有严重精神障碍。以犯罪者表面上精神异常行为为特征的非常规陌生人杀人案子类别在很大程度上既符合典型的陌生人杀人案结构,也符合“疯狂行为”这一普遍观念。