Significance of Staining Intensity in Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Meningiomas, and a Critical Review of the Literature on Proliferation Index Assessment.

OBJECTIVE

Meningioma is the most common primary adult intracranial neoplasm, and proliferation indices (PI) rise with increasing grade from WHO CNS grade 1 to 3. Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (IHC) poses a variety of technical and interpretative challenges. Here, we specifically investigated the staining intensity and its effect on interpretation and final diagnosis.

METHODS

124 high and low-grade meningiomas of various grades were blindly evaluated using different counting strategies (CS) based on the staining intensity of the nuclei as darkest (CS1), darkest+intermediate (CS2), and any staining (CS3) in hot-spots (HS) and in the context of overall proliferative activity (OPA).

RESULT

CSs in HS, OPA, and their average results were significantly different between low-grade and high-grade groups. PI obtained using CS3 yielded results that matched best with values expected for the corresponding WHO grade. CS had a profound impact on whether a LG meningioma would be diagnosed as one with a "high proliferation index."

CONCLUSION

A large body of work exists on the counting methods, clinically significant cut-off values, and inter- and intra-observer variability for Ki-67 PI interpretation. We show that Ki-67 IHC staining intensity, which to our knowledge has not been previously systematically investigated, can have a significant effect on PI interpretation in settings that influence diagnostic and clinical management decisions.