Nguyen Martin, Aulick Samuel, Kennedy Christopher
Clinical Sciences, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 27;16(4):e59153. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59153. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Over three years since the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic, it is still a global burden. Vaccines against COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, are available and effective for preventing disease. However, their protective effects are not 100%. Currently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has only approved a limited number of inpatient treatments for COVID-19, such as remdesivir, baricitinib, and tocilizumab. These medications have indications and contraindications applicable to a select patient population. Finding additional effective therapies that are widely available with limited risk could be vital in optimizing treatment strategies for this viral illness. Some vitamins and supplements have been identified as potential options for managing COVID-19. Vitamin D (VD) deficiency has been associated with respiratory tract infections. Moreover, alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is a powerful antioxidant and helps reduce inflammatory responses in many pathologic conditions. This review aims to analyze the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of VD and alpha-lipoic acid in COVID-19 infection in both outpatient and hospitalized patients. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via the PubMed database from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023. Inclusion criteria were as follows: the study design was a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the usage of a constant dose during the intervention period without any additional boluses, and a research ethics committee approved it. Exclusion criteria included a lack of an outcome or apparent intervention, additional boluses, or a single-dose regimen in all the interventional groups. There were 11 studies with a total sample size of 35,717 patients that met the criteria for this review. A total of 10 RCTs examined the efficacy of VD, and one RCT that reviewed the efficacy of ALA was identified. All of the articles investigated the use of VD or ALA during the treatment of COVID-19. The endpoints of each study varied, including length of stay in hospital, viral load, SARS-CoV-2 infection rate, mechanical ventilation, inflammatory markers, clinical symptoms, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and mortality. In 8/10 VD supplementation trials, significant differences were identified between the interventional and placebo groups in the aforementioned parameters. In 2/10 VD supplementation trials, no significant differences were identified. The ALA supplementation RCT found no differences between the interventional and placebo groups in the SOFA score and 30-day all-cause mortality rate. The current literature suggests that VD can potentially reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate, oxygen requirements, inflammatory markers, clinical symptoms, and mortality. Regarding ALA, although there was a suggestion of benefit, it was not statistically significant. Common limitations among the different studies included relatively small sample sizes, different geographical patient locations among studies, and differences in dosages. Trials investigating the effects of higher doses of VD supplementation on SARS-CoV-2 infection should be conducted. More research is needed to define best practices and optimal dosing protocols for the use of VD in COVID-19.
自世界卫生组织(WHO)宣布新冠疫情为大流行已过去三年多,它仍是一项全球负担。针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的新冠肺炎的疫苗已可获得且对预防疾病有效。然而,它们的保护作用并非100%。目前,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)仅批准了有限数量的新冠肺炎住院治疗药物,如瑞德西韦、巴瑞替尼和托珠单抗。这些药物有适用于特定患者群体的适应证和禁忌证。找到更多广泛可用且风险有限的有效疗法对于优化这种病毒性疾病的治疗策略可能至关重要。一些维生素和补充剂已被确定为管理新冠肺炎的潜在选择。维生素D(VD)缺乏与呼吸道感染有关。此外,α-硫辛酸(ALA)是一种强大的抗氧化剂,有助于在许多病理状况下减轻炎症反应。本综述旨在分析关于VD和α-硫辛酸在门诊和住院新冠肺炎患者感染中有效性的现有证据。通过PubMed数据库识别了2021年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入标准如下:研究设计为随机对照试验(RCT),干预期间使用恒定剂量且无任何额外推注,并且研究获得伦理委员会批准。排除标准包括所有干预组缺乏结局或明显干预、额外推注或单剂量方案。有11项研究符合本综述标准,总样本量为35717例患者。共10项RCT研究了VD的疗效,确定了1项综述ALA疗效的RCT。所有文章均研究了新冠肺炎治疗期间VD或ALA的使用。每项研究的终点各不相同,包括住院时间、病毒载量、SARS-CoV-2感染率、机械通气、炎症标志物、临床症状、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和死亡率。在10项VD补充试验中的8项中,干预组和安慰剂组在上述参数上存在显著差异。在10项VD补充试验中的2项中,未发现显著差异。ALA补充RCT发现干预组和安慰剂组在SOFA评分和30天全因死亡率方面无差异。当前文献表明,VD可能降低SARS-CoV-2感染率、氧气需求、炎症标志物、临床症状和死亡率。关于ALA,尽管有获益的迹象,但无统计学意义。不同研究的常见局限性包括样本量相对较小、研究中的地理患者位置不同以及剂量差异。应开展研究更高剂量VD补充对SARS-CoV-2感染影响的试验。需要更多研究来确定新冠肺炎中使用VD的最佳实践和最佳给药方案。