Suppr超能文献

碳离子放疗治疗实体肿瘤的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Healthcare Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.

Division of New Health Technology Assessment, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2024 Jun;65(6):332-340. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0439.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) compared to that of conventional radiotherapy in patients with various types of solid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched eight electronic databases from inception until August 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The comparative effectiveness of the different treatment options was assessed by a random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

This review included 34 comparative studies and three treatment groups. Overall, the meta-analysis indicated comparable local control rates between the CIRT and control groups [pooled risk ratio (RR)=1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.15]. The local control rate in the CIRT group was higher than that in the photon therapy group, but slightly lower than that in the proton radiation therpy (PRT) group. Additionally, the CIRT group had significantly higher overall survival (OS) (RR=1.19, 95% CI=1.01-1.42) and progression-free survival (PFS) (RR=1.50, 95% CI=1.01-2.21) rates compared to the control group. In the subgroup analysis, survival rates were similar between the CIRT and PRT groups.

CONCLUSION

CIRT was associated with improved toxicity, local tumor control, OS, and PFS compared to conventional treatments. Therefore, CIRT was found to be a safe and effective option for achieving local control in patients with solid tumors.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究碳离子放疗(CIRT)与常规放疗在治疗各种实体瘤患者中的疗效差异。

材料与方法

我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,从各电子数据库建库起至 2022 年 8 月进行了系统性检索。采用随机效应荟萃分析评估不同治疗方案的比较疗效。

结果

本综述纳入了 34 项比较研究和 3 个治疗组。总体而言,荟萃分析表明 CIRT 组与对照组的局部控制率相当[合并风险比(RR)=1.02,95%置信区间(CI)0.90-1.15]。CIRT 组的局部控制率高于光子放疗组,但略低于质子放疗(PRT)组。此外,CIRT 组的总生存率(RR=1.19,95%CI=1.01-1.42)和无进展生存率(RR=1.50,95%CI=1.01-2.21)均显著高于对照组。亚组分析显示,CIRT 组与 PRT 组的生存率相似。

结论

与常规治疗相比,CIRT 可降低毒性、提高局部肿瘤控制率、总生存率和无进展生存率,因此被认为是治疗实体瘤患者的一种安全有效的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c6b/11130593/b41fa1f345be/ymj-65-332-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验