Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14331. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14331. Epub 2024 May 28.
To investigate the impact of Medicaid expansion on state expenditures through the end of 2022.
We used data from the National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO)'s State Expenditure Report, Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF)'s Medicaid expansion tracker, US Bureau of Labor Statistics data (BLS), US Bureau of Economic Analysis data (BEA), and Pandemic Response Accountability Committee Oversight (PRAC).
We investigated spending per capita (by state population) across seven budget categories, including Medicaid spending, and four spending sources. We performed a difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis that compared within-state changes in spending over time in expansion and nonexpansion states to estimate the effect of Medicaid expansion on state budgets. We adjusted for annual state unemployment rate, annual state per capita personal income, and state spending of Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) from 2020 to 2022 and included state and year fixed effects.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We linked annual state-level data on state-reported fiscal year expenditures from NASBO with state-level characteristics from BLS and BEA data and with CRF state spending from PRAC.
Medicaid expansion was associated with an average increase of 21% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16%-25%) in per capita Medicaid spending after Medicaid expansion among states that expanded prior to 2020. After inclusion of an interaction term to separate between the coronavirus disease (COVID) era (2020-2022) and the prior period following expansion (2015-2019), we found that although Medicaid expansion led to an average increase of 33% (95% CI: 21%-45%) in federal funding of state expenditures in the post-COVID years, it was not significantly associated with increased state spending.
There was no evidence of crowding out of other state expenditure categories or a substantial impact on total state spending, even in the COVID-19 era. Increased federal expenditures may have shielded states from substantial budgetary impacts.
调查到 2022 年底,医疗补助计划扩大对各州支出的影响。
我们使用了国家预算官员协会(NASBO)的州支出报告、凯撒家庭基金会(Kaiser Family Foundation)的医疗补助计划扩大追踪器、美国劳工统计局(BLS)的数据、美国经济分析局(BEA)的数据以及大流行问责委员会监督(PRAC)的数据。
我们调查了七个预算类别(包括医疗补助支出)的人均支出(按州人口计算)和四个支出来源。我们进行了差分分析(DiD),比较了扩张州和非扩张州在不同时期的支出变化,以估计医疗补助计划对州预算的影响。我们调整了 2020 年至 2022 年各州年度失业率、人均个人收入和冠状病毒救济基金(CRF)的州支出,并包括州和年度固定效应。
数据收集/提取方法:我们将 NASBO 报告的州年度财政年度支出的年度州级数据与 BLS 和 BEA 数据的州级特征以及 PRAC 的 CRF 州支出数据相链接。
在 2020 年前扩大医疗补助计划的州,在扩大医疗补助计划后,人均医疗补助支出平均增加 21%(95%置信区间[CI]:16%-25%)。在包括一个交互项以区分新冠疫情(COVID)时代(2020-2022 年)和扩大后的前一时期(2015-2019 年)之后,我们发现,尽管医疗补助计划导致 COVID 后联邦对州支出的资金平均增加了 33%(95%CI:21%-45%),但它与州支出的增加没有显著关联。
即使在 COVID-19 时代,也没有证据表明其他州支出类别被排挤出去,或者对总州支出有重大影响。联邦支出的增加可能使各州免受重大预算影响。