Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Aug;25(8):e14410. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14410. Epub 2024 May 29.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the dosimetric properties of a commercial brass GRID collimator for high energy photon beams including 15 and 10 MV. Then, the difference in dosimetric parameters of GRID beams among different energies and linacs was evaluated.
A water tank scanning system was used to acquire the dosimetric parameters, including the percentage depth dose (PDD), beam profiles, peak to valley dose ratios (PVDRs), and output factors (OFs). The profiles at various depths were measured at 100 cm source to surface distance (SSD), and field sizes of 10 × 10 cm and 20 × 20 cm on three linacs. The PVDRs and OFs were measured and compared with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations.
Compared with the open beam data, there were noticeable changes in PDDs of GRID fields across all the energies. The GRID fields demonstrated a maximal of 3 mm shift in dmax (Truebeam STX, 15MV, 10 × 10 cm). The PVDR decreased as beam energy increases. The difference in PVDRs between Trilogy and Truebeam STx using 6MV and 15MV was 1.5% ± 4.0% and 2.1% ± 4.3%, respectively. However, two Truebeam linacs demonstrated less than 2% difference in PVDRs. The OF of the GRID field was dependent on the energy and field size. The measured PDDs, PVDRs, and OFs agreed with the TPS calculations within 3% difference. The TPS calculations agreed with the measurements when using 1 mm calculation resolution.
The dosimetric characteristics of high-energy GRID fields, especially PVDR, significantly differ from those of low-energy GRID fields. Two Truebeam machines are interchangeable for GRID therapy, while a pronounced difference was observed between Truebeam and Trilogy. A series of empirical equations and reference look-up tables for GRID therapy can be generated to facilitate clinical applications.
本研究旨在描述一种商业黄铜栅格准直器在高能光子束中的剂量学特性,包括 15 和 10 MV。然后,评估不同能量和直线加速器的栅格射束在剂量学参数上的差异。
使用水箱扫描系统获取剂量学参数,包括百分深度剂量(PDD)、射束轮廓、峰谷剂量比(PVDR)和输出因子(OF)。在三个直线加速器上,在 100 cm 源皮距(SSD)处测量各种深度的轮廓,以及 10×10 cm 和 20×20 cm 的射野大小。测量并比较了 PVDR 和 OF 与治疗计划系统(TPS)计算值。
与开放射束数据相比,所有能量的栅格射野的 PDD 都有明显变化。栅格射野在 dmax 处最大有 3mm 的偏移(Truebeam STX,15MV,10×10 cm)。随着射束能量的增加,PVDR 减小。6MV 和 15MV 时,Trilogy 和 Truebeam STx 之间的 PVDR 差异分别为 1.5%±4.0%和 2.1%±4.3%,但两台 Truebeam 直线加速器的 PVDR 差异小于 2%。栅格射野的 OF 取决于能量和射野大小。测量的 PDD、PVDR 和 OF 与 TPS 计算值的差异在 3%以内。当使用 1mm 计算分辨率时,TPS 计算值与测量值一致。
高能栅格射束的剂量学特性,特别是 PVDR,与低能栅格射束有显著差异。两台 Truebeam 机器可互换用于栅格治疗,而 Truebeam 和 Trilogy 之间存在明显差异。可以生成一系列用于栅格治疗的经验公式和参考查找表,以方便临床应用。