Shanson D C, Kirk N, Humphrey R
J Clin Pathol. 1985 Jan;38(1):92-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.38.1.92.
Serum fluorescent streptococcal antibody tests were carried out on 71 patients with clinically suspected infective endocarditis, and a final diagnosis of endocarditis was obtained in 46 patients. A serological diagnosis of streptococcal endocarditis was obtained in 10 patients who had persistently negative blood cultures, as fluorescent streptococcal antibody titres equal to or greater than 400 were detected against at least one of four strains of streptococci used as heterologous antigens. There were no false positive fluorescent antibody results with heterologous antigens during tests on 29 patients who had either non-streptococcal endocarditis, a final diagnosis other than endocarditis, or streptococcal sepsis not associated with endocarditis. A negative result with the heterologous antibody test could not, however, exclude a diagnosis of streptococcal endocarditis as six of 11 patients with endocarditis due to Streptococcus viridans or Str bovis confirmed on blood culture had serum fluorescent antibody titres less than 400 against all the heterologous streptococcal antigens tested. Homologous fluorescent streptococcal antibody titres equal to or greater than 400, using the patient's own blood culture isolate as the antigen, were found in the serum samples of 14 of 15 patients with endocarditis caused by viridans streptococci, three patients with enterococcal endocarditis, two patients with endocarditis caused by Str pneumoniae, and one patient with Str bovis endocarditis. In contrast, all five patients who had clinically insignificant streptococcal bacteraemias had serum fluorescent homologous antibody titres of only 100 or less. These results showed that the homologous serum fluorescent streptococcal antibody test could help to decide the clinical importance of a streptococcus which is initially isolated from only one or two of a number of inoculated blood culture bottles.
对71例临床疑似感染性心内膜炎的患者进行了血清荧光链球菌抗体检测,最终确诊为心内膜炎的有46例。在10例血培养持续阴性的患者中,获得了链球菌性心内膜炎的血清学诊断,因为针对用作异源抗原的四种链球菌菌株中的至少一种,检测到荧光链球菌抗体滴度等于或大于400。在对29例患有非链球菌性心内膜炎、最终诊断不是心内膜炎或与心内膜炎无关的链球菌败血症的患者进行检测时,使用异源抗原未出现荧光抗体假阳性结果。然而,异源抗体检测结果为阴性并不能排除链球菌性心内膜炎的诊断,因为在血培养确诊为草绿色链球菌或牛链球菌引起的心内膜炎的11例患者中,有6例患者针对所有检测的异源链球菌抗原的血清荧光抗体滴度均低于400。在15例由草绿色链球菌引起的心内膜炎患者中的14例、3例肠球菌性心内膜炎患者、2例由肺炎链球菌引起的心内膜炎患者以及1例牛链球菌性心内膜炎患者的血清样本中,以患者自身血培养分离株作为抗原,发现同源荧光链球菌抗体滴度等于或大于400。相比之下,所有5例临床上无显著意义的链球菌菌血症患者的血清荧光同源抗体滴度仅为100或更低。这些结果表明,同源血清荧光链球菌抗体检测有助于判断最初仅从多个接种血培养瓶中的一两个中分离出的链球菌的临床重要性。