Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;119(10):2070-2078. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002851. Epub 2024 May 2.
Insurer-mandated barriers to timely initiation of advanced therapies used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been shown to worsen clinical outcomes and increase healthcare utilization, yet rarely alter the medication ultimately prescribed.
We conducted a survey within the IBD Partners longitudinal cohort to evaluate the frequency and patient-reported impacts of medication utilization barriers on insurance satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Barriers included medication denials, prior authorizations, and forced medication switches. Variables associated with insurance satisfaction, measured on a 1-7 Likert scale, were identified. The association between insurance-related barriers and downstream clinical outcomes (surgery, corticosteroid requirement, and disease activity) were evaluated.
Two thousand seventeen patients (age 45 [interquartile range 34-58] years, 73% female) were included. Seventy-two percent experienced an insurer-mandated barrier, most commonly prior authorizations (51%). Fifteen percent were denied an IBD medication by their insurer, 22% experienced an insurance-related gap in therapy, and 8% were forced by their insurer to switch from an effective medication. Insurance satisfaction was negatively associated with medication denials, prior authorization-related delays, gaps in therapy, and high-deductible health plan coverage. In the year following the initial survey, several insurance barriers were linked to negative downstream clinical outcomes, including prior authorizations associated with corticosteroid rescue (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-4.00), forced medication switches associated with continued disease activity (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.56-6.89), and medication denials associated with IBD-related surgery (OR 8.92, 95% CI 1.97-40.39).
These data illustrate the frequency and negative impacts of insurer-mandated medication barriers on patients with IBD, including decreased insurance satisfaction and negative downstream clinical outcomes.
已证实,保险公司规定的治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的先进疗法的起始时间限制会导致临床结果恶化和医疗保健利用率增加,但很少能改变最终开出的药物。
我们在 IBD 合作伙伴的纵向队列中进行了一项调查,以评估药物使用障碍对保险满意度和临床结果的频率和患者报告的影响。障碍包括药物拒绝、事先授权和强制药物转换。确定了与保险满意度相关的变量,保险满意度通过 1-7 分李克特量表进行测量。评估了与保险相关的障碍与下游临床结果(手术、皮质类固醇需求和疾病活动)之间的关系。
共纳入 2017 例患者(年龄 45 [四分位间距 34-58]岁,73%为女性)。72%的患者经历了保险公司规定的障碍,最常见的是事先授权(51%)。15%的患者被保险公司拒绝使用 IBD 药物,22%的患者经历了与保险相关的治疗中断,8%的患者被迫更换有效的药物。保险满意度与药物拒绝、与事先授权相关的延迟、治疗中断和高免赔额健康计划的覆盖范围呈负相关。在首次调查后的一年中,几种保险障碍与负面的下游临床结果相关,包括与皮质类固醇抢救相关的事先授权(比值比 [OR] 2.24,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.25-4.00)、与持续疾病活动相关的强制药物转换(OR 3.28,95% CI 1.56-6.89)以及与 IBD 相关手术相关的药物拒绝(OR 8.92,95% CI 1.97-40.39)。
这些数据说明了保险公司规定的药物障碍对 IBD 患者的频率和负面影响,包括保险满意度降低和负面的下游临床结果。