Suppr超能文献

手术入路是否会影响肝硬化患者肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的发生率?利用 NSQIP 数据库进行分析。

Does the Surgical Approach Affect the Incidence of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Cirrhotic Patients? An Analysis of the NSQIP Database.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):2901-2906. doi: 10.1177/00031348241246175. Epub 2024 May 31.

Abstract

The association between surgical approach and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in cirrhotic patients is poorly understood. We hypothesize that patients will have similar rates of liver failure regardless of whether they undergo minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) or open liver resection (OLR) in major liver resections. In contrast, there will be lower rates of PHLF in patients undergoing minor hepatectomy via the MILR approach. Propensity score matching was used to analyze regression by matching the MILR to the OLR cohort. Patient demographics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including race, age, gender, and ethnicity, were matched. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, dyspnea, dialysis dependence, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (>ASA III) were among the preoperative patient characteristics subject to matching. PHLF (Grade A vs B. vs C) was our primary outcome measure. A total of 2129 cirrhotic patients were included in the study. In the minor hepatectomy group, patients undergoing an OLR were more likely to get discharged to a facility (7.0% vs 4.4%; = .03), had greater hospital length of stay (5 vs 3 days; = .02), and had a greater need for invasive postoperative interventions (10.7% vs 4.6%; < .01). They were also noted to have higher rates of organ space superficial surgical infections (SSIs) (7.3% vs 3.7%; = .003), infection (.9% vs .1%; = .05), renal insufficiency (2.1% vs .1%; < .01), unplanned intubations (3.1% vs 1.4%; = .03), and Grade C liver failure (2.3% vs .9%; = .03). A higher incidence of PHLF grade C was found in patients undergoing OLR in the minor hepatectomy group. Therefore, in cirrhotic patients who can tolerate minimally invasive approaches, MILR should be offered to prevent postoperative complications as part of their optimization plan.

摘要

手术方式与肝硬化患者肝切除术后肝衰竭(PHLF)之间的关系尚未完全阐明。我们假设,无论患者接受微创肝切除术(MILR)还是开放性肝切除术(OLR)进行主要肝切除术,其肝衰竭的发生率都相似。相比之下,通过 MILR 方法进行小范围肝切除的患者,PHLF 的发生率较低。采用倾向评分匹配法分析 MILR 与 OLR 队列的回归情况。从美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划中匹配患者的人口统计学数据,包括种族、年龄、性别和民族。术前患者特征中,匹配的有慢性阻塞性肺疾病、充血性心力衰竭、吸烟、高血压、糖尿病、肾衰竭、呼吸困难、透析依赖、体重指数和美国麻醉师协会(ASA)分类(>ASA III)。PHLF(A级与 B 级与 C 级)是我们的主要观察指标。共有 2129 例肝硬化患者纳入研究。在小范围肝切除组中,接受 OLR 的患者更有可能出院到医疗机构(7.0%比 4.4%; =.03),住院时间更长(5 天比 3 天; =.02),术后需要更多侵入性干预(10.7%比 4.6%; <.01)。他们还存在更高的器官间隙浅表手术感染(SSI)发生率(7.3%比 3.7%; =.003)、感染发生率(0.9%比 0.1%; =.05)、肾功能不全发生率(2.1%比 0.1%; <.01)、计划外插管发生率(3.1%比 1.4%; =.03)和 C 级肝功能衰竭发生率(2.3%比 0.9%; =.03)。在小范围肝切除的 OLR 组中,术后 C 级 PHLF 的发生率更高。因此,对于能够耐受微创方法的肝硬化患者,应提供 MILR 以预防术后并发症,作为其优化方案的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验