Osa Conservation, Washington, DC, 20005, USA; Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Buenos Aires University, Buenos Aires, C1428EGA, Argentina.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;361:121263. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121263. Epub 2024 May 30.
Roads are one of the most widespread structures that drive habitat loss and fragmentation. But they also restrict animal movement and drive landscape-level impacts on biodiversity. The South Pacific of Costa Rica is known for its high levels of biodiversity, but little has been done to reduce road impacts upon wildlife communities. To understand these impacts and advise on possible mitigation action, we used three key data approaches: 1. Camera traps, to survey wildlife activity along two major road sections that dissect the region's protected areas and biological corridors. Seventy-eight camera traps were deployed in secondary forest patches at different distances (between 200 m and 1 km) from the roads for six months and covariates were collected to explain the patterns found. 2. Citizen science data extracted from iNaturalist to identify roadkill "hotspots" along the roads. And 3. Circuitscape analysis, to assess how landscape structure could influence animal movement. Camera traps recorded 30 terrestrial species. Ocelots and agoutis displayed a negative effect of distance from protected area, while the Apex predators displayed a positive effect toward higher forest cover and vegetation density. Circuitscape analysis showed high connectivity throughout most of the area. Only a few locations showed higher flow (bottle neck locations), which coincided with roadkill "hotspots" identified through citizen science direct observations (70 observations of 21 species). Amalgamating data from the different analyses allow us to identify four key wildlife crossing locations (one of less priority) along the Inter-American Highway. We strongly recommend the placement of under/overpasses in these locations, with the aim to ensure wildlife safe movement and connectivity of wildlife populations in the region. Culvert modifications in the area could also be considered to incorporate wildlife underpasses at a reduced cost.
道路是导致栖息地丧失和破碎化的最广泛结构之一。但它们也限制了动物的移动,对生物多样性产生了景观层面的影响。哥斯达黎加的南太平洋以其高水平的生物多样性而闻名,但在减少道路对野生动物社区的影响方面几乎没有采取任何措施。为了了解这些影响并为可能的缓解措施提供建议,我们使用了三种关键的数据方法:1. 相机陷阱,调查沿两条主要道路的野生动物活动,这些道路贯穿该地区的保护区和生物走廊。在距离道路不同距离(200 米至 1 公里之间)的次生林斑块中部署了 78 个相机陷阱,进行了六个月的监测,并收集了协变量来解释发现的模式。2. 从 iNaturalist 提取的公民科学数据,以确定道路沿线的“热点”。3. Circuitscape 分析,评估景观结构如何影响动物的移动。相机陷阱记录了 30 种陆地物种。豹猫和食蚁兽与保护区的距离呈负相关,而顶级捕食者则与更高的森林覆盖率和植被密度呈正相关。Circuitscape 分析显示,该地区大部分地区的连通性都很高。只有少数几个地点的流量更高(瓶颈位置),这与通过公民科学直接观察确定的道路死亡“热点”相吻合(21 个物种中的 70 个观察)。对不同分析的数据进行综合分析,可以确定在泛美公路沿线的四个关键野生动物过境地点(一个优先级较低)。我们强烈建议在这些地点安装地下/地上通道,目的是确保野生动物的安全移动,并确保该地区野生动物种群的连通性。还可以考虑在该地区修改涵洞,以较低的成本在涵洞下修建野生动物通道。