Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Anticancer Res. 2024 Jun;44(6):2661-2670. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.17073.
BACKGROUND/AIM: In East Asia, the standard treatment for resectable advanced gastric cancer involves gastrectomy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy; nevertheless, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is also expected to improve survival rates. However, it remains unclear whether the same criteria can be used to select adjuvant chemotherapy for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or how survival varies between post-chemotherapy pathological Stage (ypStage) and pathological Stage without chemotherapy (pStage). This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of ypStage and pStage in gastric cancers and investigated the optimal intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who have received preoperative chemotherapy.
From January 2007 to November 2019, 1,585 patients underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the Kanagawa Cancer Center. The patient background was adjusted by propensity score matching, and recurrence-free survival was compared between the two groups. In addition, a prognostic factor analysis was conducted for each yp/pStage.
The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for yp/pStage I were 77.1% and 90.9%, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.342). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for yp/pStage II were 50.4% and 69.1%, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.062). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for yp/pStage III were 42.9% and 68.7%, respectively, with a significant difference observed (p=0.016). In the prognostic factor analysis for each stage, the presence or absence of preoperative chemotherapy was selected as an independent prognostic factor for yp/pStage I [hazard ratio (HR)=17.72; p=0.001] and yp/pStage II (HR=2.655, p=0.003).
ypStage tends to have a worse prognosis than pStage, and further development of multidisciplinary treatment is necessary.
背景/目的:在东亚,可切除的晚期胃癌的标准治疗方法包括胃切除术和术后辅助化疗;然而,新辅助化疗也有望提高生存率。然而,目前尚不清楚是否可以使用相同的标准来选择接受新辅助化疗的患者的辅助化疗,或者化疗后病理分期(ypStage)和无化疗病理分期(pStage)之间的生存率如何有所不同。本研究评估了胃癌的 ypStage 和 pStage 的长期结果,并探讨了接受术前化疗的患者辅助化疗的最佳强度。
2007 年 1 月至 2019 年 11 月,1585 例胃癌患者在神奈川癌症中心接受根治性胃切除术。通过倾向评分匹配调整患者背景,并比较两组患者的无复发生存率。此外,对每个 yp/pStage 进行了预后因素分析。
yp/pStage I 的 5 年无复发生存率分别为 77.1%和 90.9%,无显著差异(p=0.342)。yp/pStage II 的 5 年无复发生存率分别为 50.4%和 69.1%,无显著差异(p=0.062)。yp/pStage III 的 5 年无复发生存率分别为 42.9%和 68.7%,差异有统计学意义(p=0.016)。在每个阶段的预后因素分析中,术前化疗的存在与否被选为 yp/pStage I [风险比(HR)=17.72;p=0.001]和 yp/pStage II 的独立预后因素(HR=2.655,p=0.003)。
ypStage 的预后往往比 pStage 差,需要进一步开展多学科治疗。