Suppr超能文献

双管重建可提高近端胃癌患者的生活质量,并更好地维持 BMI。

Double tract reconstruction improves the quality of life and better maintain the BMI of patients with proximal gastric cancer.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2024 May 31;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02454-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of double-tract reconstruction on short-term clinical outcome, quality of life and nutritional status of patients after proximal gastrectomy by comparing with esophagogastrostomy and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients who underwent double tract reconstruction (DTR), esophagogastrostomy (EG), total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (TG-RY) were retrospectively collected from May 2020 to May 2022. The clinical characteristics, short-term surgical outcomes, postoperative quality of life and nutritional status were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the DTR group, the operation time in the TG group was significantly shorter (200(180,240) minutes vs. 230(210,255) minutes, p < 0.01), and more lymph nodes were removed (28(22, 25) vs. 22(19.31), p < 0.01), there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, first flatus time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rate among the three groups. Postoperative digestive tract angiography was completed in 36 patients in the DTR group, of which 21 (58.3%) showed double-tract type of food passing. The incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms was 9.2% in the DTR group, 43.8% in the EG group and 23.2% in the TG group, repectively (P < 0.01). EORTCQLQ-STO22 questionnaire survey showed that compared with EG group, DTR group had fewer reflux symptoms (P < 0.05), fewer anxiety symptoms (P < 0.05) and more swallowing symptoms (P < 0.05). Compared with TG group, DTR group had fewer reflux symptoms (P < 0.05). There were no other significant differences between the two groups. Compared with TG group and EG group, DTR can better maintain postoperative BMI, and there is no statistical difference between the three groups in terms of hemoglobin and albumin.

CONCLUSIONS

Although partial double-tract reconstruction approach does not always ensure food to enter the distal jejunum along the two pathways as expected, it still shows satisfactory anti-reflux effect. Moreover, it might improve patients' quality of life and maintain better nutritional status comparing with gastroesophageal anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过比较双通道重建(DTR)、食管胃吻合术(EG)和 Roux-en-Y 重建的全胃切除术(TG-RY),探讨双道重建对近端胃切除术后短期临床结局、生活质量和营养状况的影响。

方法

回顾性收集 2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 5 月行 DTR、EG 和 TG-RY 治疗的患者的临床资料。比较三组患者的临床特征、短期手术结果、术后生活质量和营养状况。

结果

与 DTR 组相比,TG 组的手术时间明显缩短(200(180,240)min 比 230(210,255)min,p<0.01),且淋巴结清扫数目更多(28(22,25)比 22(19.31),p<0.01),三组患者术中出血量、首次肛门排气时间、术后住院时间和术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。DTR 组 36 例患者完成术后消化道造影,其中 21 例(58.3%)显示双道型食物通过。DTR 组术后反流症状发生率为 9.2%,EG 组为 43.8%,TG 组为 23.2%(P<0.01)。EORTCQLQ-STO22 问卷调查显示,与 EG 组相比,DTR 组反流症状更少(P<0.05),焦虑症状更少(P<0.05),吞咽症状更多(P<0.05)。与 TG 组相比,DTR 组反流症状更少(P<0.05)。两组间其他指标差异均无统计学意义。与 TG 组和 EG 组相比,DTR 术后 BMI 保持更好,三组间血红蛋白和白蛋白差异无统计学意义。

结论

尽管部分双通道重建方法并不总能确保食物按预期沿两条途径进入远端空肠,但仍显示出令人满意的抗反流效果。此外,与食管胃吻合术和 Roux-en-Y 重建的全胃切除术相比,它可能改善患者的生活质量并维持更好的营养状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d43/11140886/139bc0943b79/12893_2024_2454_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验