• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析新型植物肉替代品类别:感知与肉相似性背景下的消费者情感和感官反应。

Profiling the novel plant-based meat alternative category: Consumer affective and sensory response in the context of perceived similarity to meat.

机构信息

Food Experience and Sensory Testing (Feast) Lab, School of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.

Statistics Group, School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

出版信息

Food Res Int. 2024 Jul;188:114465. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114465. Epub 2024 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114465
PMID:38823862
Abstract

Plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) are increasingly popular and may contribute towards reduction of negative environmental impacts associated with the meat industry. Inferior sensory characteristics of PBMAs, compared to conventional meat products, remain a barrier for uptake of these products. This study aimed to profile a wide range of PBMAs for perceived similarity to meat, consumer liking, emotional response and sensory experience, and to determine consumer drivers of liking for this product category. Twenty-one PBMAs, spanning a broad range of product types (burger patties, sausages, meatball alternatives, chicken/beef pieces, bacon alternative, turkey roast alternative) and main protein ingredients (extruded plant proteins, tofu, or legumes/vegetables) representative of PBMAs available to Aotearoa New Zealand consumers, were tasted and evaluated by 140 Aotearoa New Zealand residents. Samples ranged widely in their perceived similarity to meat (median value range: 1.0-4.0 on a 5-point-scale) and overall liking ratings (mean ± SD, range: 35.1 ± 1.2--77.7 ± 17.4 on a 100-point hedonic scale). Overall liking ratings were driven mostly by liking for flavour, followed by texture, and less so by appearance. Sensorially, sample differentiation was mostly associated with variation in meat-related flavours and textures, or vegetable-related attributes. Notably meat flavour was the main driver of liking, and a very strong relationship (r = 0.92) was observed between perceived similarity to meat and overall sample liking ratings. Meat-like samples were also associated with positive emotional terms, whereas samples made from wholefoods were associated with negative emotional terms. Textural terms ('gluey/slimy', 'pasty/doughy') associated with wholefood products were also negative drivers for liking, and should be avoided in future PBMA products. In conclusion, the general population maintains a strong preference for PBMAs that are similar to meat, validating ongoing efforts to improve the meat-like properties of new and emerging products. PBMAs made from wholefoods require extensive product development to achieve consumer satisfaction across the category.

摘要

植物肉替代品(PBMAs)越来越受欢迎,可能有助于减少与肉类行业相关的负面环境影响。与传统肉类产品相比,PBMAs 较差的感官特性仍然是消费者接受这些产品的障碍。本研究旨在对广泛的 PBMAs 进行分析,以了解它们与肉类的相似程度、消费者的喜好程度、情感反应和感官体验,并确定消费者对这类产品的喜好驱动因素。21 种 PBMAs,涵盖了广泛的产品类型(汉堡饼、香肠、肉丸替代品、鸡肉/牛肉块、培根替代品、火鸡烤肉替代品)和主要蛋白质成分(挤压植物蛋白、豆腐或豆类/蔬菜),代表了新西兰消费者可获得的 PBMAs,由 140 名新西兰居民品尝和评估。这些样本在其与肉类的感知相似性(5 分制的中位数范围为 1.0-4.0)和整体喜好评分(100 分制的平均值±标准差,范围为 35.1±1.2--77.7±17.4)上差异很大。整体喜好评分主要受风味喜好、其次是质地的影响,而外观的影响较小。感官上,样本的差异主要与与肉类相关的风味和质地的变化,或与蔬菜相关的属性有关。值得注意的是,肉类风味是喜好的主要驱动因素,感知到的与肉类的相似性和整体样本的喜好评分之间存在很强的关系(r=0.92)。类似肉的样本也与积极的情绪术语相关,而由全食品制成的样本则与消极的情绪术语相关。与全食品产品相关的质地术语(“粘稠/粘滑”、“糊状/面团状”)也是喜好的负面驱动因素,在未来的 PBMAs 产品中应避免使用。总的来说,普通人群对与肉类相似的 PBMAs 保持强烈的偏好,这验证了人们正在努力提高新产品和新兴产品的肉类特性。由全食品制成的 PBMAs 需要进行广泛的产品开发,才能在整个类别中满足消费者的需求。

相似文献

1
Profiling the novel plant-based meat alternative category: Consumer affective and sensory response in the context of perceived similarity to meat.剖析新型植物肉替代品类别:感知与肉相似性背景下的消费者情感和感官反应。
Food Res Int. 2024 Jul;188:114465. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114465. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Sensory characteristics of plant-based milk alternatives: Product characterisation by consumers and drivers of liking.植物基奶替代品的感官特征:消费者的产品特征描述和喜好的驱动因素。
Food Res Int. 2024 Mar;180:114093. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114093. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Sensory, emotional, and appropriateness of plant- and meat-based burgers.植物基和肉类汉堡的感官、情感和适宜性。
J Food Sci. 2024 May;89(5):2974-2990. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17033. Epub 2024 May 6.
4
Sensory and hedonic perception of meat versus ultra-processed plant-based meat analogs: A comparative study.肉类与超加工植物性肉类替代品的感官和享乐感知:一项比较研究。
J Food Sci. 2024 Dec;89(12):10329-10343. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17531. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
5
Food essentialism is associated with perceptions of plant-based meat alternatives possessing properties of meat-based products.食物本质主义与认为植物性肉类替代品具有肉类产品特性的观念相关联。
Food Qual Prefer. 2025 Feb;123. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105328. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Understanding consumer acceptability of verjuice, its potential applications and sensory and chemical drivers of liking.了解消费者对绿葡萄汁的接受程度、其潜在应用以及影响喜好的感官和化学因素。
Food Res Int. 2024 Jul;188:114480. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114480. Epub 2024 May 10.
7
Consumer perception of plant-based yoghurt: Sensory drivers of liking and emotional, holistic and conceptual associations.消费者对植物基酸奶的感知:喜欢的感官驱动因素以及情感、整体和概念联想。
Food Res Int. 2023 May;167:112666. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112666. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
8
Consumer evaluations of commercially available plant-based cheddar cheese alternatives reveal inferior taste, nutrition and emotional appeal.消费者对市售植物基切达干酪替代品的评价显示,其在口感、营养和情感吸引力方面较差。
Food Res Int. 2025 Jan;200:115452. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115452. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
9
Plant-Based Chocolate Desserts: Analysis of Consumer's Response According to Sensory Properties of Products and Consumer Attitude Towards Meat Reduction.植物基巧克力甜点:根据产品感官特性及消费者对减少肉类摄入的态度分析消费者反应
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2025 Mar 18;80(2):93. doi: 10.1007/s11130-025-01338-3.
10
Drivers of Preference and Perception of Freshness in Roasted Peanuts (Arachis spp.) for European Consumers.欧洲消费者对烤花生(落花生属)偏好和新鲜度的驱动因素。
J Food Sci. 2018 Apr;83(4):1103-1115. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14095. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumer perceptions of plant-based and mushroom-based jerky: A focus on texture, main ingredient and protein information, and willingness to pay.消费者对植物基和蘑菇基肉干的认知:聚焦于质地、主要成分和蛋白质信息以及支付意愿。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2025 Apr 30;10:101058. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2025.101058. eCollection 2025.
2
Replacing Animal Meat with Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: The Impact of Protein Quality on Protein Adequacy in the Dutch Diet.用植物性肉类替代品取代动物肉:蛋白质质量对荷兰饮食中蛋白质充足性的影响。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2025 Feb 5;9(3):104562. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.104562. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Texture profile analysis and rheology of plant-based and animal meat.
植物性肉类和动物性肉类的质地剖面分析与流变学
Food Res Int. 2025 Mar;205:115876. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.115876. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
4
Alternative proteins; A path to sustainable diets and environment.替代蛋白:通往可持续饮食与环境的途径。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 Oct 10;9:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100882. eCollection 2024.
5
Consumer Expectations for Cream Cheese: A Category Appraisal Study in the United Kingdom with Dairy and Plant-Based Variants in Various Flavours.消费者对奶油芝士的期望:英国一项针对各种口味的乳制品和植物基变体的品类评估研究。
Foods. 2025 Jan 29;14(3):445. doi: 10.3390/foods14030445.
6
Plant-Based Burgers in the Spotlight: A Detailed Composition Evaluation and Comprehensive Discussion on Nutrient Adequacy.植物性汉堡成为焦点:成分详细评估与营养充足性全面探讨
Foods. 2025 Jan 23;14(3):372. doi: 10.3390/foods14030372.
7
From Farms to Labs: The New Trend of Sustainable Meat Alternatives.从农场到实验室:可持续肉类替代品的新趋势。
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025 Jan;45(1):13-30. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e105. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
8
Impact of Substituting Meats with Plant-Based Analogues on Health-Related Markers: A Systematic Review of Human Intervention Studies.用植物性模拟物替代肉类对健康相关指标的影响:人体干预研究的系统评价。
Nutrients. 2024 Jul 31;16(15):2498. doi: 10.3390/nu16152498.