School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Animal Science Department, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Oct;107(10):8609-8628. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-24809. Epub 2024 May 31.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of heat stress on mammary epithelial cell (MEC) losses into milk, secretory mammary tissue structure, and mammary epithelial cell activity. Sixteen multiparous Holstein cows (632 ± 12 kg BW) approximately 100 DIM housed in climate-controlled rooms were paired by BW and randomly allocated to one of 2 treatments, heat stress (HS) or pair-feeding thermoneutral (PFTN) using 2 cohorts. Each cohort was subjected to 2 periods of 4 d each. In period 1, both treatments had ad libitum access to a common TMR and were exposed to a controlled daily temperature-humidity index (THI) of 64. In period 2, HS cows were exposed to controlled cyclical heat stress (THI: 74-80), while PFTN cows remained at 64 THI and daily DMI was matched to that of the HS cows. Cows were milked twice daily, and milk yield was recorded at each milking. Individual milk samples on the last day of each period were used to quantify MEC losses by flow cytometry using butyrophilin as a cell surface marker. On the final day of period 2, individual bovine mammary tissue samples were obtained for histomorphology analysis, assessment of protein abundance, and evaluation of gene expression of targets associated with cellular capacity for milk and milk component synthesis, heat response, cellular proliferation, and autophagy. Statistical analysis was performed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. Milk yield was reduced by 4.3 kg by HS (n = 7) compared with PFTN (n = 8). Independent of treatment, MEC in milk averaged 174 cells/mL (2.9% of total cells). There was no difference between HS and PFTN cows for MEC shed or concentration in milk. Alveolar area was reduced 25% by HS, and HS had 4.1 more alveoli than PFTN. The total number of nucleated MEC per area was greater in HS cows (389 ± 1.05; mean ± SE) compared with PFTN (321 ± 1.05); however, cell number per alveolus was similar between groups (25 ± 1.5 vs. 26 ± 1.4). There were no differences in relative fold expression for GLUT1, GLUT8, CSN2, CSN3, LALBA, FASN, HSPA5, and HSPA8 in HS cows compared with PFTN cows. Immunoblotting analyses showed a decrease in abundance for phosphorylated STAT5 and S6K1, and an increase in LC3 II in HS cows compared with PFTN cows. These results suggest that even if milk yield differences and histological changes occur in the bovine mammary gland after 4 d of heat exposure, MEC loss into milk, nucleated MEC number per alveolus, and gene expression of nutrient transport, milk component synthesis, and heat-stress-related targets are unaffected. In contrast, the abundance of proteins related to protein synthesis and cell survival decreased significantly, whereas proteins associated with autophagy were upregulated in HS cows compared with PFTN cows.
本研究旨在评估热应激对乳上皮细胞(MEC)向乳汁中流失、分泌乳腺组织结构和乳上皮细胞活性的影响。将 16 头大约 100 日龄、产奶量为 632±12kgBW 的荷斯坦奶牛按照 BW 进行配对,并随机分为热应激(HS)或配对喂养常温(PFTN)两组,每组 8 头。每个队列进行 4 天的 2 个周期。在第 1 周期,两组均自由采食相同的 TMR,并暴露于控制的每日温度-湿度指数(THI)为 64。在第 2 周期,HS 奶牛暴露于控制的周期性热应激(THI:74-80),而 PFTN 奶牛仍保持在 64 THI,且每日 DMI 与 HS 奶牛相匹配。奶牛每天挤奶 2 次,并在每次挤奶时记录产奶量。每个周期的最后一天采集单个牛奶样本,通过使用乳转铁蛋白作为细胞表面标志物的流式细胞术来定量 MEC 损失。在第 2 周期的最后一天,获取单个牛乳腺组织样本进行组织形态学分析、蛋白质丰度评估以及与细胞产奶和乳成分合成、热应激、细胞增殖和自噬相关的靶基因表达评估。使用 SAS 的 GLIMMIX 过程进行统计分析。与 PFTN(n=8)相比,HS(n=7)组的产奶量减少了 4.3kg。无论处理方式如何,MEC 在牛奶中的平均浓度为 174 个细胞/ml(占总细胞的 2.9%)。HS 和 PFTN 奶牛的 MEC 脱落或牛奶中的浓度没有差异。HS 组的肺泡面积减少了 25%,HS 组的肺泡数比 PFTN 组多 4.1 个。HS 奶牛的每个肺泡的有核 MEC 总数(389±1.05;均值±SE)高于 PFTN 奶牛(321±1.05);然而,两组之间的每个肺泡的细胞数相似(25±1.5 vs. 26±1.4)。与 PFTN 奶牛相比,HS 奶牛中 GLUT1、GLUT8、CSN2、CSN3、LALBA、FASN、HSPA5 和 HSPA8 的相对倍数表达没有差异。免疫印迹分析显示,与 PFTN 奶牛相比,HS 奶牛中磷酸化 STAT5 和 S6K1 的丰度降低,LC3 II 的含量增加。这些结果表明,即使在牛乳腺暴露于热应激 4 天后出现产奶量差异和组织学变化,MEC 向乳汁中的流失、每个肺泡的有核 MEC 数量以及与营养物质转运、乳成分合成和热应激相关的靶基因的表达也不受影响。相反,与 PFTN 奶牛相比,与蛋白质合成和细胞存活相关的蛋白质丰度显著降低,而与自噬相关的蛋白质在 HS 奶牛中上调。