Suppr超能文献

不同危险因素与严重和非严重低血糖的关联:胰岛素治疗的 1 型糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病患者低血糖评估工具前瞻性观察研究。

Differential associations of risk factors with severe and non-severe hypoglycaemia: the Hypoglycaemia Assessment Tool prospective observational study in people with insulin-treated type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Aug;26(8):3361-3370. doi: 10.1111/dom.15677. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the differential association of risk factors with severe and non-severe hypoglycaemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Hypoglycaemia Assessment Tool study evaluated the risk of hypoglycaemia over a 4-week period in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) on insulin in 24 countries. Negative binomial regressions were applied to examine the associations of several risk factors with severe and non-severe hypoglycaemia.

RESULTS

The median age was 41 years in 5949 patients with T1D and 62 years in 12 914 patients with T2D. The 4-week rates of non-severe hypoglycaemic were 5.57 and 1.40 episodes per person in T1D and T2D, respectively; the corresponding rates for severe hypoglycaemia were 0.94 and 0.30. The excess risk was 42% higher for severe than non-severe hypoglycaemia in females versus males with T2D; 27% higher in patients with T2D with versus without a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); and 47% lower in patients with T1D with versus without an insulin pump. The excess risk also differed across geographical areas and was marginally lower for severe than non-severe hypoglycaemia for higher values of HbA1c in patients with T2D. Associations with severity of hypoglycaemia were not different for age, diabetes and insulin therapy duration, previous hypoglycaemic episodes and insulin regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of severe versus non-severe hypoglycaemia differs in patients with T1D and T2D; sex, the use of a CGM and insulin pump, and geographical areas were differently associated with one type of hypoglycaemia than the other.

摘要

目的

评估危险因素与严重和非严重低血糖之间的差异关联。

材料和方法

低血糖评估工具研究在 24 个国家评估了 1 型糖尿病(T1D)和 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者在胰岛素治疗 4 周期间发生低血糖的风险。应用负二项回归分析来检查几种危险因素与严重和非严重低血糖之间的关联。

结果

在 5949 例 T1D 患者和 12914 例 T2D 患者中,中位年龄分别为 41 岁和 62 岁。T1D 和 T2D 患者 4 周内非严重低血糖的发生率分别为每人 5.57 次和 1.40 次;严重低血糖的发生率分别为 0.94 次和 0.30 次。与男性相比,女性 T2D 患者严重低血糖的风险比非严重低血糖高 42%;与无连续血糖监测(CGM)的患者相比,有 CGM 的 T2D 患者高 27%;与无胰岛素泵的患者相比,有胰岛素泵的 T1D 患者高 47%。在不同的地理区域,严重低血糖的风险也存在差异,且 T2D 患者的 HbA1c 值越高,严重低血糖的风险比非严重低血糖的风险越低。与低血糖严重程度相关的因素包括年龄、糖尿病和胰岛素治疗持续时间、既往低血糖发作和胰岛素治疗方案,在严重低血糖和非严重低血糖患者中没有差异。

结论

T1D 和 T2D 患者严重低血糖与非严重低血糖的风险不同;性别、CGM 和胰岛素泵的使用以及地理区域与一种低血糖的关联程度与另一种不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验