Faull T W, Hesby R A, Pelleu G B, Eastwood G W
J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Jan;53(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90059-9.
The marginal openings of single and twin foil-bonded aluminous porcelain crowns were compared in crowns fabricated indirectly for extracted teeth and directly on typodont teeth. The crowns were cemented with zinc phosphate, embedded in plastic, and sectioned. Marginal opening was measured directly with a traveling microscope. There was no significant difference between the marginal openings of twin- and single-foil crowns fabricated indirectly for extracted teeth. When the crowns were constructed directly on typodont teeth to eliminate the variables of impression-making and die fabrication, the single-foil crowns possessed a significantly smaller marginal opening than the twin-foil crowns. Both the twin- and single-foil complete porcelain crowns resulted in clinically acceptable margins. The single-foil crowns were easier to make.
在为拔除牙间接制作以及直接在牙模型上制作的单箔和双箔粘结铝瓷冠中,比较了它们的边缘开口情况。这些冠用磷酸锌粘固,嵌入塑料中并进行切片。用移动显微镜直接测量边缘开口。为拔除牙间接制作的双箔和单箔冠的边缘开口之间没有显著差异。当直接在牙模型上制作冠以消除印模制作和模型制作的变量时,单箔冠的边缘开口明显小于双箔冠。双箔和单箔全瓷冠的边缘在临床上均可接受。单箔冠更容易制作。