Suppr超能文献

用于评估长期居住在长期护理机构中患有痴呆症的老年人在常规血液检查期间疼痛的生理生物标志物。

Physiological Biomarkers for Assessment of Pain during Routine Blood Tests for Older Adults with Dementia in Long-Term Residential Care.

机构信息

Master Degree Program in Health and Long-term Care Industry, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Aug;25(8):105050. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105050. Epub 2024 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluating pain in individuals with dementia can be difficult when verbal communication is limited. Vocalization has emerged as a potential avenue for assessments of pain in nonverbal populations. This study aimed to evaluate if physiological assessments of vocalization were correlated with observational assessments of pain during routine blood tests for persons with dementia.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional descriptive study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Sixty older adults (aged ≥65 years old) with dementia requiring routine finger puncture and peripheral venipuncture for routine blood tests were recruited by purposive sampling from 3 long-term care facilities in Taiwan.

METHODS

Observational assessments were conducted with the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) instrument; physiological biomarkers of vocalization were assessed with a noninvasive sensing device and microphone (NISDM). Assessments were conducted simultaneously in one session during situations of increasing pain levels: at rest, making a sound, finger puncture, and peripheral venipuncture. PAINAD scores were compared with signal recording measures from the NISDM. Analysis of variance and Pearson correlation coefficient assessed correlations between observational and physiological measures.

RESULTS

Most participants were female (63.3%); mean age was 81.27 years (SD = 9.69); Clinical Dementia Rating was 2.23 ± 0.70; and Mini-Mental State Examination was 7.07 ± 6.95. Signal recording measures using the NISDM during finger puncture and venipuncture were significantly greater compared with measures at rest and making sound, indicating higher signal levels were associated with pain. PAINAD scores were significantly correlated with physiological measures for vocalization variables of sound amplitude (r = 0.49, P < .001), shimmer (r = 0.63, P < .001), and inhalation-to-exhalation amplitude ratio (r = 0.48, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Elevated vocalizations detected with the NISDM were correlated with increased pain scores on the PAINAD instrument. Physiological measures of pain using novel vocalization biomarkers have the potential to enhance the quality of care for individuals with dementia and limited communication abilities.

摘要

目的

当言语交流受到限制时,评估痴呆患者的疼痛可能较为困难。发声已成为评估非言语人群疼痛的潜在途径。本研究旨在评估在接受常规血液检查的痴呆患者中,生理评估的发声是否与观察性疼痛评估相关。

设计

一项横断面描述性研究。

地点和参与者

通过目的抽样,从台湾的 3 家长期护理机构中招募了 60 名需要常规手指穿刺和外周静脉穿刺进行常规血液检查的老年痴呆症患者(年龄≥65 岁)。

方法

使用疼痛评估在高级痴呆症(PAINAD)量表进行观察性评估;使用非侵入性感应装置和麦克风(NISDM)评估发声的生理生物标志物。在疼痛程度逐渐增加的情况下同时进行评估:休息、发声、手指穿刺和外周静脉穿刺。将 PAINAD 评分与 NISDM 的信号记录测量值进行比较。方差分析和 Pearson 相关系数评估了观察性和生理测量值之间的相关性。

结果

大多数参与者为女性(63.3%);平均年龄为 81.27 岁(标准差=9.69);临床痴呆评分(Clinical Dementia Rating)为 2.23 ± 0.70;简易精神状态检查(Mini-Mental State Examination)为 7.07 ± 6.95。与休息和发声时相比,手指穿刺和静脉穿刺时使用 NISDM 进行的信号记录测量值显著更高,表明更高的信号水平与疼痛相关。PAINAD 评分与发声变量的声幅(r=0.49,P<.001)、颤抖(r=0.63,P<.001)和吸入-呼出幅度比(r=0.48,P<.001)的生理测量值显著相关。

结论和意义

NISDM 检测到的发声增加与 PAINAD 仪器上的疼痛评分增加相关。使用新型发声生物标志物的疼痛生理测量具有提高痴呆症和沟通能力有限患者护理质量的潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验