• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用胎儿生物测量预测 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的巨大儿出生:一项回顾性队列研究。

Prediction of large-for-gestational-age at birth using fetal biometry in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Steno Diabetes Center North Jutland, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;167(2):695-704. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15711. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15711
PMID:38831743
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare ultrasound-assessed fetal head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), HC/AC ratio, and estimated fetal weight (EFW) in prediction of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) at birth in pregnancies affected by type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all women with T1DM and T2DM giving birth to singletons between 2010 and 2019 at Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark. Ultrasound scans were performed at 16, 20, 28 and 34 weeks of pregnancy. LGA was defined as birth weight deviation of 15% or greater from the expected for gestational age (≥90th centile). Prediction of LGA was assessed by logistic regression adjusted for maternal characteristics and glycated hemoglobin (HbA) and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Among 180 T1DM pregnancies, 118 (66%) had an LGA neonate at birth. At 28 weeks of pregnancy, they were predicted with AUC = 0.67, AUC = 0.85, and AUC = 0.86. The multivariate analysis did not improve the predictive performance of the HC/AC ratio or AC. Among 87 T2DM pregnancies, 36 (41%) had an LGA neonate at birth. At 28 weeks, they were predicted with AUC = 0.73, AUC = 0.83, and AUC = 0.87. In T2DM, the multivariate analysis significantly improved the predictive performance for both HC/AC ratio and AC from 20 weeks of pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

In T1DM and T2DM pregnancies, LGA is characterized by a general fetal overgrowth including both AC and HC. Therefore, AC and EFW perform better than the HC/AC ratio in the prediction of LGA. In T2DM, as opposed to T1DM, the predictive performance was improved by the inclusion of maternal characteristics and HbA in the analysis.

摘要

目的

比较超声评估胎儿头围(HC)、腹围(AC)、HC/AC 比值和估计胎儿体重(EFW)在预测 1 型(T1DM)和 2 型(T2DM)糖尿病妊娠中巨大儿(LGA)出生时的作用。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2010 年至 2019 年期间在丹麦奥尔堡大学医院分娩的 T1DM 和 T2DM 单胎妊娠妇女。超声检查在妊娠 16、20、28 和 34 周进行。LGA 定义为出生体重与胎龄预期值相差 15%或以上(≥第 90 百分位数)。通过调整母体特征和糖化血红蛋白(HbA)的逻辑回归评估 LGA 的预测,并计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

在 180 例 T1DM 妊娠中,有 118 例(66%)新生儿出生时为 LGA。在 28 周妊娠时,其 AUC 分别为 0.67、0.85 和 0.86。多变量分析并未改善 HC/AC 比值或 AC 的预测性能。在 87 例 T2DM 妊娠中,有 36 例(41%)新生儿出生时为 LGA。在 28 周时,其 AUC 分别为 0.73、0.83 和 0.87。在 T2DM 中,多变量分析显著改善了 20 周妊娠时 HC/AC 比值和 AC 的预测性能。

结论

在 T1DM 和 T2DM 妊娠中,LGA 表现为胎儿整体生长过度,包括 AC 和 HC。因此,AC 和 EFW 在预测 LGA 方面优于 HC/AC 比值。在 T2DM 中,与 T1DM 不同,将母体特征和 HbA 纳入分析可提高预测性能。

相似文献

1
Prediction of large-for-gestational-age at birth using fetal biometry in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study.应用胎儿生物测量预测 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的巨大儿出生:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;167(2):695-704. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15711. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
2
Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.通过常规孕晚期超声预测大于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;54(3):326-333. doi: 10.1002/uog.20377. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
3
Prediction of large-for-gestational-age infant by fetal growth charts and hemoglobin A1c level in pregnancy complicated by pregestational diabetes.妊娠合并孕前糖尿病孕妇胎儿生长曲线和血红蛋白 A1c 水平预测巨大儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;60(6):751-758. doi: 10.1002/uog.26071.
4
The value of fetal growth biometry velocities to predict large for gestational age (LGA) infants.胎儿生长生物测量速度预测大于胎龄(LGA)婴儿的价值。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Jun;35(11):2099-2104. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1779214. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks.预测 35-37 孕周的小于胎龄儿:母亲因素的影响和 32-36 孕周间的生长速度。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;53(5):630-637. doi: 10.1002/uog.20267. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.单胎及多胎胎儿生物测量用于检测早产及足月的小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿:一项纵向队列研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0164161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164161. eCollection 2016.
7
Fetal overgrowth in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.1型和2型糖尿病女性的胎儿过度生长。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187917. eCollection 2017.
8
Antenatal prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies affected by maternal pre-gestational diabetes.孕妇孕前糖尿病对胎儿巨大儿的产前预测。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):7412-7416. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1949447. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.32 周与 36 周常规超声检查:预测小于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.孕晚期胎儿生物测量对小于胎龄儿的预测及超声检查与分娩间隔的影响
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):372-378. doi: 10.1002/uog.15959.