Verlinsky Luke, Heath David M, Momtaz David A, Christopher Boris, Singh Aaron, Gibbons Steven D
Department of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
J Child Orthop. 2024 Mar 16;18(3):295-301. doi: 10.1177/18632521241238889. eCollection 2024 Jun.
PURPOSE: Ankle injuries involving the tibiofibular syndesmosis often necessitate operative fixation to restore stability to the ankle. Recent literature in the adult population has suggested that suture button fixation may be superior to screw fixation. There is little evidence as to which construct is preferable in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study investigates outcomes of suture button and screw fixation in adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study over 10 years of pediatric patients who underwent ankle syndesmotic fixation at a large Level 1 Trauma Center was conducted. Both isolated syndesmotic injuries and ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption were included. Preoperative variables collected include basic patient demographics, body mass index, and fracture type. Suture button and screw cohorts were matched based on age, race, sex, and open fracture utilizing propensity scores. Outcomes assessed include reoperation and implant failure. RESULTS: A total of 44 cases of operative fixation of the ankle syndesmosis were identified with a mean age of 16 years. After matching cohorts based on age, sex, race, and open fracture status, there were 17 patients in the suture button and screw cohorts, respectively. Patients undergoing screw fixation had a six times greater risk of reoperation (p = 0.043) and 13 times greater risk of implant failure (p < 0.001). Out of six cases of reoperation in the screw cohort, five were unplanned. CONCLUSION: Our findings favor suture button fixation in operative management of adolescent tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. Compared with screws, suture buttons are associated with lower risk of both reoperation and implant failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level III therapeutic.
目的:涉及胫腓联合的踝关节损伤通常需要手术固定以恢复踝关节的稳定性。近期针对成人的文献表明,缝线纽扣固定可能优于螺钉固定。关于在儿童和青少年人群中哪种固定方式更可取,几乎没有证据。本研究调查青少年踝关节联合损伤中缝线纽扣和螺钉固定的效果。 方法:对一家大型一级创伤中心10年间接受踝关节联合固定的儿科患者进行回顾性匹配队列研究。纳入单纯联合损伤以及伴有联合损伤的踝关节骨折。收集的术前变量包括患者基本人口统计学资料、体重指数和骨折类型。利用倾向评分根据年龄、种族、性别和开放性骨折情况对缝线纽扣组和螺钉组进行匹配。评估的结果包括再次手术和内植物失败。 结果:共确定44例踝关节联合手术固定病例,平均年龄16岁。根据年龄、性别、种族和开放性骨折状态匹配队列后,缝线纽扣组和螺钉组分别有17例患者。接受螺钉固定的患者再次手术风险高6倍(p = 0.043),内植物失败风险高13倍(p < 0.001)。在螺钉组的6例再次手术病例中,5例为非计划性手术。 结论:我们的研究结果支持在青少年胫腓联合损伤的手术治疗中采用缝线纽扣固定。与螺钉相比,缝线纽扣的再次手术和内植物失败风险更低。 证据等级:三级治疗性证据。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017-7-4
J Orthop Trauma. 2019-9
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019