文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

青少年踝关节下胫腓联合损伤治疗中螺钉与缝线纽扣固定的比较

A comparison of screw and suture button fixation in the management of adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries.

作者信息

Verlinsky Luke, Heath David M, Momtaz David A, Christopher Boris, Singh Aaron, Gibbons Steven D

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Child Orthop. 2024 Mar 16;18(3):295-301. doi: 10.1177/18632521241238889. eCollection 2024 Jun.


DOI:10.1177/18632521241238889
PMID:38831850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11144380/
Abstract

PURPOSE: Ankle injuries involving the tibiofibular syndesmosis often necessitate operative fixation to restore stability to the ankle. Recent literature in the adult population has suggested that suture button fixation may be superior to screw fixation. There is little evidence as to which construct is preferable in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study investigates outcomes of suture button and screw fixation in adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study over 10 years of pediatric patients who underwent ankle syndesmotic fixation at a large Level 1 Trauma Center was conducted. Both isolated syndesmotic injuries and ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption were included. Preoperative variables collected include basic patient demographics, body mass index, and fracture type. Suture button and screw cohorts were matched based on age, race, sex, and open fracture utilizing propensity scores. Outcomes assessed include reoperation and implant failure. RESULTS: A total of 44 cases of operative fixation of the ankle syndesmosis were identified with a mean age of 16 years. After matching cohorts based on age, sex, race, and open fracture status, there were 17 patients in the suture button and screw cohorts, respectively. Patients undergoing screw fixation had a six times greater risk of reoperation (p = 0.043) and 13 times greater risk of implant failure (p < 0.001). Out of six cases of reoperation in the screw cohort, five were unplanned. CONCLUSION: Our findings favor suture button fixation in operative management of adolescent tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. Compared with screws, suture buttons are associated with lower risk of both reoperation and implant failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level III therapeutic.

摘要

目的:涉及胫腓联合的踝关节损伤通常需要手术固定以恢复踝关节的稳定性。近期针对成人的文献表明,缝线纽扣固定可能优于螺钉固定。关于在儿童和青少年人群中哪种固定方式更可取,几乎没有证据。本研究调查青少年踝关节联合损伤中缝线纽扣和螺钉固定的效果。 方法:对一家大型一级创伤中心10年间接受踝关节联合固定的儿科患者进行回顾性匹配队列研究。纳入单纯联合损伤以及伴有联合损伤的踝关节骨折。收集的术前变量包括患者基本人口统计学资料、体重指数和骨折类型。利用倾向评分根据年龄、种族、性别和开放性骨折情况对缝线纽扣组和螺钉组进行匹配。评估的结果包括再次手术和内植物失败。 结果:共确定44例踝关节联合手术固定病例,平均年龄16岁。根据年龄、性别、种族和开放性骨折状态匹配队列后,缝线纽扣组和螺钉组分别有17例患者。接受螺钉固定的患者再次手术风险高6倍(p = 0.043),内植物失败风险高13倍(p < 0.001)。在螺钉组的6例再次手术病例中,5例为非计划性手术。 结论:我们的研究结果支持在青少年胫腓联合损伤的手术治疗中采用缝线纽扣固定。与螺钉相比,缝线纽扣的再次手术和内植物失败风险更低。 证据等级:三级治疗性证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02d/11144380/bf5a1d40cd66/10.1177_18632521241238889-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02d/11144380/5b82e39db216/10.1177_18632521241238889-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02d/11144380/09424f7ef5e4/10.1177_18632521241238889-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02d/11144380/bf5a1d40cd66/10.1177_18632521241238889-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02d/11144380/5b82e39db216/10.1177_18632521241238889-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02d/11144380/09424f7ef5e4/10.1177_18632521241238889-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02d/11144380/bf5a1d40cd66/10.1177_18632521241238889-fig3.jpg

相似文献

[1]
A comparison of screw and suture button fixation in the management of adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries.

J Child Orthop. 2024-3-16

[2]
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017-7-4

[3]
The Clinical Efficacy of Suture-Button Fixation and Trans-Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Ankle Fracture Combined With Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Retrospective Study.

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022

[4]
Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries.

Foot Ankle Int. 2016-12

[5]
Suture Button Fixation Versus Syndesmotic Screws in Supination-External Rotation Type 4 Injuries: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Am J Sports Med. 2017-1

[6]
Arthroscopically measured syndesmotic stability after screw vs. suture button fixation in a cadaveric model.

Injury. 2017-11

[7]
Suture-Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw Fixation of Ankle Fractures: A Comparative Retrospective Review Over One Year.

Cureus. 2021-9-8

[8]
Comparison of suture button fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Surg. 2018-11-12

[9]
Syndesmotic Suture Button Fixation Results in Higher Tegner Activity Scale Scores When Compared to Screw Fixation: A Multicenter Investigation.

Foot Ankle Spec. 2024-6

[10]
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Treatment of Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic Rupture: Suture-Button Fixation Versus Cortical Screw Fixation.

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Disclosed Industry Funding Does Not Increase Positive Outcomes in Studies on Suture Button Fixation for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review.

Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025-6-19

[2]
Quadrimalleolar ankle fracture with syndesmosis disruption-a minimally invasive approach with arthroscopic repair of the anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL); a case report.

Trauma Case Rep. 2025-4-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Functional outcome of routine versus on-demand removal of the syndesmotic screw: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Bone Joint J. 2021-11

[2]
The Clinical Efficacy of Suture-Button Fixation and Trans-Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Ankle Fracture Combined With Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Retrospective Study.

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022

[3]
Suture-button Versus Screw Fixation in Adolescent Syndesmotic Injuries: Functional Outcomes and Maintenance of Reduction.

J Pediatr Orthop. 2021-7-1

[4]
Syndesmotic Screw Breakage May Be More Problematic Than Previously Reported: Increased Rates of Hardware Removal Secondary to Pain With Intraosseous Screw Breakage.

Foot Ankle Spec. 2022-2

[5]
Better outcome for suture button compared with single syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial.

Bone Joint J. 2020-2

[6]
Syndesmotic Fixation Utilizing a Novel Screw: A Retrospective Case Series Reporting Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

Foot Ankle Spec. 2020-10

[7]
Effect of a Dynamic Fixation Construct on Syndesmosis Reduction: A Cadaveric Study.

J Orthop Trauma. 2019-9

[8]
Cost analysis of ankle syndesmosis internal fixation.

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019

[9]
Comparison of suture button fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Surg. 2018-11-12

[10]
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Syndesmotic Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation in Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injuries.

J Orthop Trauma. 2018-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索