Centre for Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), School of Pharmacy, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Anal Chim Acta. 2024 Jul 11;1312:342758. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2024.342758. Epub 2024 May 21.
The selection of the sample treatment strategy is a crucial step in the metabolomics workflow. Solid phase microextraction (SPME) is a sample processing methodology with great potential for use in untargeted metabolomics of tissue samples. However, its utilization is not as widespread as other standard protocols involving steps of tissue collection, metabolism quenching, homogenization, and extraction of metabolites by solvents. Since SPME allows us to perform all these steps in one action in tissue samples, in addition to other advantages, it is necessary to know whether this methodology produces similar or comparable metabolome and lipidome coverage and performance to classical methods.
SPME and homogenization with solid-liquid extraction (Homo-SLE) sample treatment methods were applied to healthy murine kidney tissue, followed by comprehensive metabolomics and lipidomics analyses. In addition, it has been tested whether freezing and storage of the tissue causes alterations in the renal metabolome and lipidome, so the analyses were performed on fresh and frozen tissue samples Lipidomics analysis revealed the exclusive presence of different structural membrane and intracellular lipids in the Homo-SLE group. Conversely, all annotated metabolites were detected in both groups. Notably, the freezing of the sample mainly causes a decrease in the levels of most lipid species and an increase in metabolites such as amino acids, purines, and pyrimidines. These alterations are principally detected in a statistically significant way by SPME methodology. Finally, the samples of both methodologies show a positive correlation in all the analyses.
These results demonstrate that in SPME processing, as long as the fundamentals of non-exhaustive extraction in a pre-equilibrium kinetic regime, extraction in a tissue localized area, the chemistry of the fiber coating and non-homogenization of the tissue are taken into account, is an excellent method to use in kidney tissue metabolomics; since this methodology presents an easy-to-use, efficient, and less invasive approach that simplifies the different sample processing steps.
样本处理策略的选择是代谢组学工作流程中的关键步骤。固相微萃取(SPME)是一种具有很大潜力的样品处理方法,可用于组织样品的非靶向代谢组学研究。然而,它的应用并不像其他涉及组织收集、代谢物猝灭、匀浆和溶剂提取代谢物等步骤的标准方法那样广泛。由于 SPME 允许我们在组织样品中一步完成所有这些步骤,除了其他优点之外,我们还需要知道这种方法是否能产生与经典方法相似或可比的代谢组和脂质组覆盖范围和性能。
SPME 和固相-液相萃取(Homo-SLE)样品处理方法被应用于健康的小鼠肾脏组织,随后进行了全面的代谢组学和脂质组学分析。此外,还测试了组织的冷冻和储存是否会导致肾脏代谢组和脂质组的改变,因此对新鲜和冷冻的组织样本进行了分析。脂质组学分析显示,Homo-SLE 组中存在不同结构的膜和细胞内脂质。相反,两组都检测到所有注释的代谢物。值得注意的是,样品的冷冻主要导致大多数脂质种类的水平降低,以及氨基酸、嘌呤和嘧啶等代谢物的水平增加。这些变化主要通过 SPME 方法在统计学上得到检测。最后,两种方法的样品在所有分析中都呈正相关。
这些结果表明,在 SPME 处理中,只要考虑到非耗竭提取的基本原理、在预平衡动力学条件下的提取、纤维涂层的化学性质和组织的非匀浆化,SPME 就是一种极好的肾脏组织代谢组学方法;因为这种方法具有易于使用、高效和微创的特点,简化了不同的样品处理步骤。