Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2200 Childrens Way, Suite 4202, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Department of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
Spine Deform. 2024 Nov;12(6):1689-1698. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00909-9. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
There is variability in clinical outcomes with vertebral body tethering (VBT) partly due to a limited understanding of the growth modulation (GM) response. We used the largest sample of patients with 3D spine reconstructions to characterize the vertebra and disc morphologic changes that accompany growth modulation during the first two years following VBT.
A multicenter registry was used to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent VBT with 2 years of follow-up. Calibrated biplanar X-rays obtained at longitudinal timepoints underwent 3D reconstruction to obtain precision morphological measurements. GM was defined as change in instrumented coronal angulation from post-op to 2-years.
Fifty patients (mean age: 12.5 ± 1.3yrs) were analyzed over a mean of 27.7 months. GM was positively correlated with concave vertebra height growth (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), 3D spine length growth (r = 0.36, p = 0.008), and decreased convex disc height (r = - 0.42, p = 0.002). High modulators (patients experiencing GM > 10°) experienced an additional 1.6 mm (229% increase) of mean concave vertebra growth during study period compared to the Poor Modulators (GM < - 10°) group, (2.3 vs. 0.7 mm, p = 0.039), while convex vertebra height growth was similar (1.3 vs. 1.4 mm, p = 0.91).
When successful, VBT enables asymmetric vertebra body growth, leading to continued postoperative coronal angulation correction (GM). A strong GM response is correlated with concave vertebral body height growth and overall instrumented spine growth. A poor GM response is associated with an increase in convex disc height (suspected tether rupture). Future studies will investigate the patient and technique-specific factors that influence increased growth remodeling.
椎体束缚(VBT)的临床结果存在差异,部分原因是对生长调节(GM)反应的理解有限。我们使用最大的 3D 脊柱重建患者样本,描述 VBT 后前两年伴随生长调节的椎体和椎间盘形态变化。
使用多中心登记处确定接受 VBT 治疗并随访 2 年的特发性脊柱侧凸患者。在纵向时间点获得的校准双平面 X 射线进行 3D 重建以获得精确的形态学测量。GM 定义为术后到 2 年时仪器矫正冠状角的变化。
50 名患者(平均年龄:12.5 ± 1.3 岁)在平均 27.7 个月的时间内进行了分析。GM 与凹侧椎体高度生长(r=0.57,p<0.001)、3D 脊柱长度生长(r=0.36,p=0.008)呈正相关,与凸侧椎间盘高度减小(r=-0.42,p=0.002)呈负相关。高调节剂(GM>10°)在研究期间经历了 1.6 毫米(229%增长)的平均凹侧椎体生长,而较差调节剂(GM<-10°)组为 0.7 毫米(2.3 与 0.7 毫米,p=0.039),而凸侧椎体高度生长相似(1.3 与 1.4 毫米,p=0.91)。
当 VBT 成功时,它可以使椎体不对称生长,从而导致术后冠状角度持续矫正(GM)。强 GM 反应与凹侧椎体高度生长和整个仪器脊柱生长相关。较差的 GM 反应与凸侧椎间盘高度增加(怀疑束缚断裂)相关。未来的研究将探讨影响生长重塑增加的患者和技术特异性因素。