Haake Julia, Meller Sebastian, Meyerhoff Nina, Twele Friederike, Charalambous Marios, Talbot Steven R, Volk Holger A
Department of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Institute for Laboratory Animal Science and Central Animal Laboratory, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 May 21;11:1374511. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1374511. eCollection 2024.
Canine cognitive dysfunction (CCD) is a common, yet underdiagnosed neurodegenerative disease affecting older dogs. Treatment is most effective when started early, so identifying mild cognitive decline in the earlier stages of the disease is considered important.
HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of three different standard screening questionnaires [Canine Dementia Scale (CADES), Canine Cognitive Assessment Scale (CCAS), and Canine Cognitive Dysfunction Rating Scale (CCDR)] for CCD diagnosis. Trainability, pain sensitivity, and fear were additionally assessed with the Canine Behavioral Assessment and Research Questionnaire (C-BARQ) in order to evaluate associations between the three dementia scales and behavior.
An online survey containing all the mentioned questionnaires was designed for and distributed among owners of elderly dogs.
Data from 597 dogs were analyzed. Overall, the scores of the three CCD questionnaires correlated well with each other, especially those of the CADES and CCAS. The CADES was more sensitive in identifying dogs with already mild to moderate cognitive impairment, while the others classified them as still undergoing normal aging. CCD scores increased for all questionnaires with age with spatial orientation being a key feature in CCD development. Trainability assessed with the C-BARQ decreased significantly with severity of CCD signs, while pain sensitivity increased. Fear and anxiety was pronounced in animals with mild but not with severe CCD. These associations based on the C-BARQ were more clearly observable in relation to CADES and CCDR than CCAS.
CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The choice of screening questionnaire impacts the evaluation of cognitive status and severity of CCD. Thresholds for severity classification differ significantly and may have an impact on reliable assessment. Further longitudinal studies are required to determine which of the questionnaires investigated in this study is best suited for early detection of CCD.
犬类认知功能障碍(CCD)是一种常见但诊断不足的神经退行性疾病,影响老年犬。早期开始治疗最为有效,因此在疾病早期识别轻度认知衰退被认为很重要。
假设/目的:比较三种不同的标准筛查问卷[犬类痴呆量表(CADES)、犬类认知评估量表(CCAS)和犬类认知功能障碍评定量表(CCDR)]用于CCD诊断的结果。此外,使用犬类行为评估与研究问卷(C-BARQ)评估可训练性、疼痛敏感性和恐惧,以评估三种痴呆量表与行为之间的关联。
设计了一份包含所有上述问卷的在线调查,并分发给老年犬的主人。
分析了597只犬的数据。总体而言,三种CCD问卷的得分彼此相关性良好,尤其是CADES和CCAS的得分。CADES在识别已经有轻度至中度认知障碍的犬方面更敏感,而其他问卷将它们归类为仍处于正常衰老阶段。所有问卷的CCD得分均随年龄增长而增加,空间定向是CCD发展的关键特征。用C-BARQ评估的可训练性随CCD症状严重程度显著下降,而疼痛敏感性增加。轻度但非重度CCD的动物存在明显的恐惧和焦虑。与CCAS相比,基于C-BARQ的这些关联在与CADES和CCDR的关系中更明显。
结论/临床意义:筛查问卷的选择会影响对CCD认知状态和严重程度的评估。严重程度分类的阈值差异显著,可能会对可靠评估产生影响。需要进一步的纵向研究来确定本研究中调查的哪种问卷最适合早期检测CCD。