Suppr超能文献

评估肺静脉隔离中应用高能短时间及冷冻球囊消融时颈动脉超声的微栓子信号:气泡和固体栓子何时何地产生?

Evaluation of microembolic signals on carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation with high-power short-duration and cryoballoon ablations: When and where do bubble and solid emboli arise?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi, Mie, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug;35(8):1589-1600. doi: 10.1111/jce.16337. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The underlying risks of asymptomatic embolization during high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation for atrial fibrillation remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate microembolic signals (MESs) during HPSD ablation with power settings of 50 and 90 W in comparison with those during cryoballoon (CB) ablation using a novel carotid ultrasound-Doppler system that classifies solid and air bubble signals using real-time monitoring.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-seven patients underwent HPSD ablation using radiofrequency (RF), and 13 underwent CB ablation. MESs were evaluated using a novel pastable soft ultrasound probe equipped with a carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation. We compared the detailed MESs and their timing between RF and CB ablations. The number of MESs and solid signals were significantly higher in the RF group than in CB group (209 ± 229 vs. 79 ± 32, p = .047, and 83 ± 89 vs. 28 ± 17, p = .032, respectively). In RF ablation, the number of MESs, solid, and bubble signals per ablation point, or per second, was significantly higher at 90 W than at 50 W ablation. The MESs, solid, and bubble signals were detected more frequently in the bottom and anterior walls of the left pulmonary vein (LPV) ablation. In contrast, many MESs were observed before the first CB application and decreased chronologically as the procedure progressed. Signals were more prevalent during the CB interval rather than during the freezing time. Among the 28 patients, 4 exhibited a high-intensity area on postbrain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI-positive group showed a trend of larger signal sizes than did the MRI-negative group.

CONCLUSION

The number of MESs was higher in the HPSD RF group than in the CB group, with this risk being more pronounced in the 90 W ablation group. The primary detection site was the anterior wall of the LPV in RF and the first interval in CB ablation.

摘要

简介

在高功率短时间(HPSD)消融治疗心房颤动过程中,无症状栓塞的潜在风险尚不清楚。我们旨在通过使用新型颈动脉超声-多普勒系统评估 HPSD 消融时的微栓塞信号(MES),该系统使用实时监测对固体和气泡信号进行分类,消融功率分别设定为 50 和 90 W,并与冷冻球囊(CB)消融时的 MES 进行比较。

方法和结果

47 例患者接受了射频(RF)HPSD 消融,13 例患者接受了 CB 消融。在肺静脉隔离过程中,使用新型可粘贴软探头和颈动脉超声评估 MES。我们比较了 RF 和 CB 消融之间的详细 MES 及其时间。RF 组的 MES 数量和固体信号明显高于 CB 组(209±229 对 79±32,p=0.047,83±89 对 28±17,p=0.032)。在 RF 消融中,90 W 消融时每个消融点或每秒的 MES 数量、固体信号和气泡信号均明显高于 50 W 消融。MES 信号、固体信号和气泡信号在左肺静脉(LPV)底部和前壁消融时更频繁地被检测到。相反,在第一次 CB 应用之前观察到许多 MES,并且随着手术的进行,这些信号会按时间顺序减少。在 CB 间隔期间信号更为普遍,而不是在冷冻时间期间。在 28 例患者中,4 例患者在脑磁共振成像(MRI)后出现高强度区域。MRI 阳性组的信号尺寸大于 MRI 阴性组。

结论

HPSD RF 组的 MES 数量高于 CB 组,90 W 消融组的风险更高。在 RF 中,主要检测部位是 LPV 的前壁,在 CB 中,主要检测部位是第一个间隔。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验