Cambridge Environmental Assessments (RSK ADAS Ltd), Cambridge, UK.
Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Münster, Germany.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Nov;20(6):2218-2230. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4952. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
To characterize the potential for exposure of amphibian terrestrial life stages to plant protection products (PPP), we studied the occurrence and habitat use of adult and metamorph common frogs (Rana temporaria) and common toads (Bufo bufo) in an agricultural landscape in Germany. The four selected study sites were breeding ponds with approximately 80% agricultural land within a 1-km radius. Adults were monitored by radio tracking for two years, and metamorph numbers were assessed for one summer using pitfall traps alongside drift fences. The results demonstrate that adults were rarely present in arable fields at any of the sites (overall 0.5% and 4% of total observations for frogs and toads, respectively). Metamorph captures in arable fields were more variable, ranging from 1.2% to 38.8% (frogs) and from 0.0% to 26.1% (toads) across study sites. Unsurprisingly, most captures in arable fields for both toad and frog metamorphs occurred at the site where the pond was completely surrounded by arable fields. Overall, the presence of adult amphibians in arable fields was limited and, for the metamorphs, occurred primarily when crops were denser and PPP spray interception higher. Diurnal hiding behavior was observed with the highest activity recorded at night, further reducing the risk of dermal exposure from direct PPP overspraying. In addition, it appeared that alternative habitats, such as woody structures or water bodies in the broader surrounding area, were preferred by the animals over the arable areas. The use of buffer zones around water bodies in agricultural areas would be an effective risk mitigation measure to protect terrestrial adults and metamorphs residing there and would reduce spray drift entry into water bodies during PPP application. It is hoped that these results will contribute to the discussion of risk assessment and mitigation options for amphibians. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:2218-2230. © 2024 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
为了描述两栖类陆生生活阶段接触植物保护产品(PPP)的潜在风险,我们在德国的一个农业景观中研究了成年和变态期普通青蛙(Rana temporaria)和普通蟾蜍(Bufo bufo)的出现和栖息地利用情况。四个选定的研究地点是拥有约 80%农业用地的繁殖池塘,其周围 1 公里范围内。我们通过无线电追踪对成年个体进行了为期两年的监测,并使用陷阱和漂流围栏在一个夏季评估了变态期个体的数量。研究结果表明,在任何一个地点,成年个体在耕地中很少出现(青蛙和蟾蜍的总观察数中,分别只有 0.5%和 4%)。在耕地中捕获的变态期个体数量变化较大,从 1.2%到 38.8%(青蛙)和从 0.0%到 26.1%(蟾蜍)不等,这取决于研究地点。毫不奇怪,对于蟾蜍和青蛙的变态期个体,大多数在耕地中捕获的个体都发生在池塘完全被耕地包围的那个地点。总体而言,两栖类成年个体在耕地中的存在是有限的,对于变态期个体来说,主要发生在作物更密集、PPP 喷雾截留更高的情况下。我们观察到了日间隐藏行为,夜间的活动记录最高,这进一步降低了因直接 PPP 喷雾过量而导致皮肤接触的风险。此外,动物似乎更喜欢利用周围更广泛的替代栖息地,如树木结构或水体,而不是耕地。在农业区水体周围设置缓冲区将是一种有效的风险缓解措施,可以保护栖息在那里的陆生成年个体和变态期个体,并减少 PPP 应用过程中喷雾漂移进入水体。我们希望这些结果将有助于讨论对两栖类动物的风险评估和缓解选择。《综合环境评估与管理》2024 年;20:2218-2230。© 2024 作者。综合环境评估与管理由 Wiley 期刊公司代表环境毒理化学学会(SETAC)出版。