Suppr超能文献

帕博西尼联合内分泌治疗用于新辅助化疗后复发风险高的激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者:PENELOPE-B 研究中绝经前患者的亚组分析。

Palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: subgroup analyses of premenopausal patients in PENELOPE-B.

机构信息

Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid; Spanish Breast Cancer Group, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

ESMO Open. 2024 Jun;9(6):103466. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103466. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The PENELOPE-B study demonstrated that the addition of 1-year post-neoadjuvant palbociclib to endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (BC) did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo. Here, we report results for premenopausal women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC at high risk of relapse [defined as no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a clinical, pathological stage, estrogen receptor, grading (CPS-EG) score ≥3 or 2/ypN+] were randomized to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib or placebo + standard ET. Ovarian function (OF) was evaluated by centrally assessed estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone serum levels.

RESULTS

Overall, 616 of 1250 randomized patients were premenopausal; of these, 30.0% were <40 years of age, 47.4% had four or more metastatic lymph nodes, and 58.2% had a CPS-EG score ≥3. 66.1% of patients were treated with tamoxifen alone, and 32.9% received ovarian function suppression (OFS) in addition to either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (AI). After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (97.2% completeness) no difference in iDFS between palbociclib and placebo was observed [hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.30, P = 0.737]. The estimated 3-year iDFS rate was marginally higher in the palbociclib arm (80.6% versus 78.3%). Three year iDFS was higher in patients receiving AI than tamoxifen plus OFS or tamoxifen alone (86.0% versus 78.6% versus 78.0%). Patients receiving tamoxifen plus OFS showed a favorable iDFS with palbociclib (83.0% versus 74.1%, hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-1.02, P = 0.057). Hematologic adverse events were more frequent with palbociclib (76.1% versus 1.9% grade 3-4, P < 0.001). Palbociclib seems not to negatively impact the OF throughout the treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

In premenopausal women, who received tamoxifen plus OFS as ET, the addition of palbociclib to ET results in a favorable iDFS. The safety profile seems favorable and in contrast to chemotherapy palbociclib does not impact OF throughout the treatment period.

摘要

背景

PENELOPE-B 研究表明,与安慰剂相比,在激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性的高危早期乳腺癌(BC)患者中,在新辅助内分泌治疗(ET)的基础上添加 1 年的帕博西利(palbociclib)并不能改善浸润性无病生存期(iDFS)。在此,我们报告了绝经前女性的结果。

患者和方法

具有高复发风险的激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性 BC 患者[定义为新辅助化疗后无病理完全缓解,临床、病理分期、雌激素受体、分级(CPS-EG)评分≥3 或 2/ypN+]被随机分配接受 13 个周期的帕博西利或安慰剂+标准 ET。卵巢功能(OF)通过中心评估雌二醇、卵泡刺激素和抗苗勒管激素血清水平来评估。

结果

总体而言,在 1250 名随机患者中有 616 名是绝经前患者;其中,30.0%的患者年龄<40 岁,47.4%有 4 个或更多转移淋巴结,58.2%的患者 CPS-EG 评分≥3。66.1%的患者单独接受他莫昔芬治疗,32.9%的患者在接受他莫昔芬或芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)治疗的同时接受卵巢功能抑制(OFS)。中位随访 42.8 个月(97.2%完整性)后,未观察到帕博西利与安慰剂在 iDFS 方面存在差异[风险比=0.95,95%置信区间(CI)0.69-1.30,P=0.737]。帕博西利组的估计 3 年 iDFS 率略高(80.6% vs. 78.3%)。接受 AI 的患者的 3 年 iDFS 率高于接受他莫昔芬+OFS 或他莫昔芬单药治疗的患者(86.0% vs. 78.6% vs. 78.0%)。接受他莫昔芬+OFS 的患者使用帕博西利的 iDFS 结果有利(83.0% vs. 74.1%,风险比=0.52,95%CI 0.27-1.02,P=0.057)。与安慰剂相比,帕博西利更常发生血液学不良事件(76.1% vs. 1.9%为 3-4 级,P<0.001)。帕博西利似乎不会在整个治疗期间对 OF 产生负面影响。

结论

在接受他莫昔芬+OFS 作为 ET 的绝经前女性中,在 ET 中添加帕博西利可带来有利的 iDFS。安全性似乎良好,与化疗相比,帕博西利在整个治疗期间不会影响 OF。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7964/11190462/b64e8de35383/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验