Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid; Spanish Breast Cancer Group, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.
ESMO Open. 2024 Jun;9(6):103466. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103466. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
The PENELOPE-B study demonstrated that the addition of 1-year post-neoadjuvant palbociclib to endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (BC) did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo. Here, we report results for premenopausal women.
Patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC at high risk of relapse [defined as no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a clinical, pathological stage, estrogen receptor, grading (CPS-EG) score ≥3 or 2/ypN+] were randomized to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib or placebo + standard ET. Ovarian function (OF) was evaluated by centrally assessed estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone serum levels.
Overall, 616 of 1250 randomized patients were premenopausal; of these, 30.0% were <40 years of age, 47.4% had four or more metastatic lymph nodes, and 58.2% had a CPS-EG score ≥3. 66.1% of patients were treated with tamoxifen alone, and 32.9% received ovarian function suppression (OFS) in addition to either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (AI). After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (97.2% completeness) no difference in iDFS between palbociclib and placebo was observed [hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.30, P = 0.737]. The estimated 3-year iDFS rate was marginally higher in the palbociclib arm (80.6% versus 78.3%). Three year iDFS was higher in patients receiving AI than tamoxifen plus OFS or tamoxifen alone (86.0% versus 78.6% versus 78.0%). Patients receiving tamoxifen plus OFS showed a favorable iDFS with palbociclib (83.0% versus 74.1%, hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-1.02, P = 0.057). Hematologic adverse events were more frequent with palbociclib (76.1% versus 1.9% grade 3-4, P < 0.001). Palbociclib seems not to negatively impact the OF throughout the treatment period.
In premenopausal women, who received tamoxifen plus OFS as ET, the addition of palbociclib to ET results in a favorable iDFS. The safety profile seems favorable and in contrast to chemotherapy palbociclib does not impact OF throughout the treatment period.
PENELOPE-B 研究表明,与安慰剂相比,在激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性的高危早期乳腺癌(BC)患者中,在新辅助内分泌治疗(ET)的基础上添加 1 年的帕博西利(palbociclib)并不能改善浸润性无病生存期(iDFS)。在此,我们报告了绝经前女性的结果。
具有高复发风险的激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性 BC 患者[定义为新辅助化疗后无病理完全缓解,临床、病理分期、雌激素受体、分级(CPS-EG)评分≥3 或 2/ypN+]被随机分配接受 13 个周期的帕博西利或安慰剂+标准 ET。卵巢功能(OF)通过中心评估雌二醇、卵泡刺激素和抗苗勒管激素血清水平来评估。
总体而言,在 1250 名随机患者中有 616 名是绝经前患者;其中,30.0%的患者年龄<40 岁,47.4%有 4 个或更多转移淋巴结,58.2%的患者 CPS-EG 评分≥3。66.1%的患者单独接受他莫昔芬治疗,32.9%的患者在接受他莫昔芬或芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)治疗的同时接受卵巢功能抑制(OFS)。中位随访 42.8 个月(97.2%完整性)后,未观察到帕博西利与安慰剂在 iDFS 方面存在差异[风险比=0.95,95%置信区间(CI)0.69-1.30,P=0.737]。帕博西利组的估计 3 年 iDFS 率略高(80.6% vs. 78.3%)。接受 AI 的患者的 3 年 iDFS 率高于接受他莫昔芬+OFS 或他莫昔芬单药治疗的患者(86.0% vs. 78.6% vs. 78.0%)。接受他莫昔芬+OFS 的患者使用帕博西利的 iDFS 结果有利(83.0% vs. 74.1%,风险比=0.52,95%CI 0.27-1.02,P=0.057)。与安慰剂相比,帕博西利更常发生血液学不良事件(76.1% vs. 1.9%为 3-4 级,P<0.001)。帕博西利似乎不会在整个治疗期间对 OF 产生负面影响。
在接受他莫昔芬+OFS 作为 ET 的绝经前女性中,在 ET 中添加帕博西利可带来有利的 iDFS。安全性似乎良好,与化疗相比,帕博西利在整个治疗期间不会影响 OF。