General Family Medicine, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
The First Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ther Drug Monit. 2024 Aug 1;46(4):422-433. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001228. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Authors conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline for randomized controlled trials comparing the prognosis and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors with other therapies for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect sizes. The primary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 4943 patients diagnosed with stage III/IV advanced or metastatic NSCLC were included in the analysis of the 6 randomized controlled trials. The results showed that patients receiving dual immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors had a longer survival time compared with the control group (HR = 0.88, P = 0.044). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (HR = 0.95, P = 0.579). Subgroup analysis revealed better OS in the interventional group for patients aged >65 years (HR = 0.88, P = 0.076), smokers (HR = 0.81, P = 0.036), and those with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥20 mut/Mb (HR = 0.66, P < 0.001). Conversely, the control group demonstrated superior OS in patients with TMB <20 mut/Mb (HR = 1.14, P = 0.048). In addition, the statistical results indicated a lower incidence rate of any-grade anemia in the dual immunotherapy group compared with the control group (RR = 0.32, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of dual immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors for treating advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Its efficacy is influenced by certain clinical and pathological factors, such as age, smoking status, and TMB.
背景:本荟萃分析旨在探讨程序性死亡受体 1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)联合细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞相关抗原 4(CTLA-4)抑制剂治疗晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效和安全性。
方法:作者对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Medline 进行了全面检索,以查找比较 PD-1/PD-L1 联合 CTLA-4 抑制剂与其他疗法治疗晚期或转移性 NSCLC 的预后和安全性的随机对照试验。使用风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)作为效应量。本研究的主要结局是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期。
结果:共有 4943 例诊断为 III/IV 期晚期或转移性 NSCLC 的患者纳入了 6 项随机对照试验的分析。结果表明,接受 PD-1/PD-L1 联合 CTLA-4 抑制剂双重免疫治疗的患者与对照组相比,生存时间更长(HR=0.88,P=0.044)。然而,无进展生存期(HR=0.95,P=0.579)无统计学差异。亚组分析显示,对于年龄>65 岁(HR=0.88,P=0.076)、吸烟者(HR=0.81,P=0.036)和肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)≥20 mut/Mb(HR=0.66,P<0.001)的患者,干预组的 OS 更好。相反,TMB<20 mut/Mb 的对照组患者的 OS 更好(HR=1.14,P=0.048)。此外,统计结果表明,双重免疫治疗组任何级别贫血的发生率低于对照组(RR=0.32,P=0.04)。
结论:本荟萃分析表明,PD-1/PD-L1 联合 CTLA-4 抑制剂的双重免疫疗法治疗晚期或转移性 NSCLC 的有效性和安全性。其疗效受某些临床和病理因素的影响,如年龄、吸烟状况和 TMB。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6