Suppr超能文献

有刻板卷舌行为的奶牛能更好地适应它们的环境吗?

Do cows with stereotypic tongue-rolling behaviour cope better with their environment?

作者信息

Li Chenyang, Chen Xiaoyang, Fang Tingting, Gu Xianhong

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2024 May 22;11:1404539. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1404539. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Stereotypic behaviours, especially oral stereotypic behaviours, are frequently expressed in farm animals. Tongue-rolling is the most common oral stereotypic behaviour in dairy cows (). If animals frequently display stereotypic behaviours, this is an indication of poor welfare. It has been suggested that animals express stereotypic behaviours as a way of coping with stress. As a result, animals with stereotypic behaviours may have lower levels of stress hormones than animals without stereotypic behaviours.

METHODS

In this study, 916 Holstein cows in the first lactation were subjected to scan sampling behavioural observations 200 times for 10 days. All cows were assigned to either a stereotypic behaviours group (SB) or a control group (CON). The SB group was further subdivided into a tongue-rolling group (TR) and an other-stereotypic behaviours group (OS). The TR group was also split into an only tongue-rolling group (OTR) and a mixed tongue-rolling and other stereotypic behaviours group (TROS). Some cows in the TR group belonged to an extreme tongue-rolling group (ETR). Hair and saliva samples were collected from 601 cows to test cortisol concentrations and dairy herd improvement (DHI) data were collected from a total of 762 cows.

RESULTS

There were no differences in hair or saliva cortisol concentrations between the groups (>0.05), and the frequencies of tongue-rolling were not associated with cortisol concentrations (>0.05). For DHI in cows, the milk protein percentage ( = 0.028), milk true protein percentage ( = 0.021) and milk crude protein percentage ( = 0.023) of cows in the ETR group were significantly lower than those in the CON group. For cows in ETR group, as the frequencies of tongue-rolling increased, the milk protein percentage ( = 0.034, r = 0.365), milk true protein percentage ( = 0.022, r = 0.393) and milk crude protein percentage ( = 0.035, r = 0.363) increased.

DISCUSSION

We investigated the relationship between stereotypic behaviours and stress by using a non-invasive sampling method to minimise harm to the cows. We suggest that tongue-rolling may not be a way for cows to cope with stress, at least in terms of cortisol concentrations.

摘要

引言

刻板行为,尤其是口腔刻板行为,在农场动物中经常出现。卷舌是奶牛中最常见的口腔刻板行为()。如果动物频繁表现出刻板行为,这表明其福利状况不佳。有人认为动物表现出刻板行为是应对压力的一种方式。因此,有刻板行为的动物的应激激素水平可能低于没有刻板行为的动物。

方法

在本研究中,对916头头胎荷斯坦奶牛进行了为期10天、共200次的扫描取样行为观察。所有奶牛被分为刻板行为组(SB)或对照组(CON)。SB组进一步细分为卷舌组(TR)和其他刻板行为组(OS)。TR组又分为仅卷舌组(OTR)和卷舌与其他刻板行为混合组(TROS)。TR组中的一些奶牛属于极端卷舌组(ETR)。从601头奶牛身上采集毛发和唾液样本以检测皮质醇浓度,并从总共762头奶牛身上收集奶牛群改良(DHI)数据。

结果

各组之间毛发或唾液皮质醇浓度无差异(>0.05),卷舌频率与皮质醇浓度无关(>0.05)。对于奶牛的DHI,ETR组奶牛的乳蛋白百分比(=0.028)、乳真蛋白百分比(=0.021)和乳粗蛋白百分比(=0.023)显著低于CON组。对于ETR组的奶牛,随着卷舌频率增加,乳蛋白百分比(=0.034,r=0.365)、乳真蛋白百分比(=0.022,r=0.393)和乳粗蛋白百分比(=0.035,r=0.363)增加。

讨论

我们通过使用非侵入性取样方法来尽量减少对奶牛的伤害,研究了刻板行为与应激之间的关系。我们认为,至少就皮质醇浓度而言,卷舌可能不是奶牛应对压力的一种方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/406c/11151878/b9ba0bcf8906/fvets-11-1404539-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验