de Oliveira Lemes Letícia Tainá, Troian-Michel Carolina Horn, Weissheimer Theodoro, Reis Só Marcus Vinicius
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Restor Dent Endod. 2024 May 9;49(2):e22. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e22. eCollection 2024 May.
This systematic review addressed the question: "What is the prevalence of apical periodontitis in patients prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation?"
A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Grey Literature Report. Eligibility criteria were based on the condition, content, and population strategy: the condition was the radiographic prevalence of apical periodontitis, the content comprised patients scheduled for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and the population consisted of adult and pediatric patients. The revised Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Exposure tool was used to assess the quality of studies. The Grading Recommendations Assessments, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to assess the quality of evidence.
Eight studies were included in this review. The average number of patients with apical periodontitis was 15.65% (range, 2.1%-43.34%). One study was classified as having a very high risk of bias, 1 with a high risk of bias, and 6 with some concern for bias. GRADE analysis showed a very low certainty of evidence. Significant limitations concerning the absence of control over confounding variables were identified.
With the caveat of the very low quality of evidence in the studies reviewed, there was a low to moderate prevalence of apical periodontitis in patients prior to undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.
本系统评价探讨了以下问题:“造血细胞移植前患者根尖周炎的患病率是多少?”
在MEDLINE/PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、科学网、Embase和灰色文献报告中进行了系统检索。纳入标准基于疾病、内容和人群策略:疾病为根尖周炎的影像学患病率,内容包括计划进行造血干细胞移植的患者,人群包括成人和儿童患者。使用修订后的非随机暴露研究偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)工具评估证据质量。
本评价纳入了8项研究。根尖周炎患者的平均比例为15.65%(范围为2.1%-43.34%)。1项研究被归类为偏倚风险非常高,1项为高偏倚风险,6项存在一些偏倚问题。GRADE分析显示证据的确定性非常低。发现了在控制混杂变量方面存在的重大局限性。
鉴于所评价研究中证据质量非常低,造血细胞移植前患者根尖周炎的患病率为低至中度。