Nakauchi Masaya, Walch Henry S, Nussenzweig Samuel, Carr Rebecca, Vos Elvira, Berger Michael F, Schultz Nikolaus, Janjigian Yelena, Wu Abraham, Tang Laura, Shah Pari, Jones David R, Coit Dan, Strong Vivian E, Molena Daniela, Sihag Smita
Department of Surgery, Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK), New York, NY.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Ann Surg. 2025 Jun 1;281(6):989-996. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006363. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
To investigate how the Siewert classification of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas correlates with genomic profiles.
Current staging and treatment guidelines recommend that tumors with an epicenter <2 cm into the gastric cardia be treated as esophageal cancers, whereas tumors with an epicenter >2 cm into the cardia be staged and treated as gastric cancers. To date, however, few studies have compared the genomic profiles of the 3 Siewert classification groups to validate this distinction.
Using targeted tumor sequencing data on patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction previously treated with surgery at our institution, we compared genomic features across Siewert classification groups.
A total of 350 patients were included: 121 had Siewert type I, 170 type II, and 59 type III. Comparisons by Siewert location revealed that Siewert types I and II were primarily characterized as the chromosomal instability molecular subtype and displayed Barrett metaplasia and p53 and cell cycle pathway dysregulation. Siewert type III tumors, by contrast, were more heterogeneous, including higher proportions of microsatellite instability and genomically stable tumors, and more frequently displayed ARID1A and somatic CDH1 alterations, signet ring cell features, and poor differentiation. Overall, Siewert type I and II tumors demonstrated greater genomic overlap with lower esophageal tumors, whereas Siewert type III tumors shared genomic features with gastric tumors.
Overall, our results support recent updates in treatment and staging guidelines. Ultimately, however, molecular rather than anatomic classification may prove more valuable in determining staging, treatment, and prognosis.
研究胃食管交界腺癌的Siewert分类与基因组图谱之间的相关性。
目前的分期和治疗指南建议,肿瘤中心位于贲门胃内<2 cm的肿瘤应作为食管癌治疗,而肿瘤中心位于贲门内>2 cm的肿瘤应作为胃癌进行分期和治疗。然而,迄今为止,很少有研究比较3个Siewert分类组的基因组图谱以验证这种区分。
利用我院此前接受手术治疗的胃食管交界腺癌患者的靶向肿瘤测序数据,我们比较了Siewert分类组之间的基因组特征。
共纳入350例患者:121例为Siewert I型,170例为II型,59例为III型。按Siewert位置进行比较发现,Siewert I型和II型主要特征为染色体不稳定分子亚型,表现为Barrett化生以及p53和细胞周期途径失调。相比之下,Siewert III型肿瘤更具异质性,包括更高比例的微卫星不稳定和基因组稳定肿瘤,并且更频繁地表现出ARID1A和体细胞CDH1改变、印戒细胞特征以及低分化。总体而言,Siewert I型和II型肿瘤与食管下段肿瘤表现出更大的基因组重叠,而Siewert III型肿瘤与胃肿瘤共享基因组特征。
总体而言,我们的结果支持治疗和分期指南的最新更新。然而,最终分子分类而非解剖学分类在确定分期、治疗和预后方面可能更有价值。