Li Xiaodong, Li Tian, Di Xingwei, Liu Jingyu
Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, Liaoning, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, Liaoning, China. Corresponding author: Liu Jingyu, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 May;36(5):503-507. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20231205-01051.
To evaluate the predictive value of a risk prediction model guided by the ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragm thickening fraction (RR/DTF) for noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition timing in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), through ultrasound evaluation of diaphragm movement indicators.
Sixty-four patients diagnosed with AECOPD and undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV), who were admitted to the department of critical care medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University from January 2022 to July 2023 were enrolled. They were divided into NIV successful group and NIV failure group based on the outcome of NIV within 24 hours. Clinical indicators such as RR/DTF, diaphragmatic excursion (DE), tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), pH value, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO), and sputum excretion disorder were compared between the two groups after 2 hours of NIV. The factors influencing NIV failure were included in binary Logistic regression analysis, and an RR/DTF oriented risk prediction model was established. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) analysis was used to assess the predictive value of this model for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.
Among 64 patients with AECOPD, with 43 in the NIV successful group and 21 in the NIV failure group. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), oxygenation index (P/F), smoking history, and acute physiological and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) between the two groups of patients, indicating comparability. Compared to the NIV successful group, the NIV failure group showed a significantly increase in RR/DTF, RR, PaCO, and sputum retention, while VT and DE were significantly decreased [RR/DTF (%): 1.00±0.18 vs. 0.89±0.22, RR (bpm): 21.64±3.13 vs. 19.62±2.98, PaCO (mmHg, 1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 70.82±8.82 vs. 65.29±9.47, sputum retention: 57.1% vs. 30.2%, VT (mL): 308.09±14.89 vs. 324.48±23.82, DE (mm): 19.91±2.94 vs. 22.05±3.30, all P < 0.05]. Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that RR/DTF [odds ratio (OR) = 147.989, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 3.321-595.412, P = 0.010], RR (OR = 1.296, 95%CI was 1.006-1.670, P = 0.045), VT (OR = 0.966, 95%CI was 0.935-0.999, P = 0.044), PaCO (OR = 1.086, 95%CI was 1.006~1.173, P = 0.035), and sputum retention (OR = 4.533, 95%CI was 1.025-20.049, P = 0.046) were independent risk factors for predicting NIV failure in AECOPD patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.713 with a 95%CI of 0.587-0.839 (P = 0.005). The sensitivity was 72.73%, the specificity was 88.10%, the Youden index was 0.394, and the optimal cut-off value was 0.87.
The RR/DTF risk prediction model has good predictive value for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.
通过超声评估膈肌运动指标,评价以呼吸频率与膈肌增厚分数比值(RR/DTF)为导向的风险预测模型对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者无创-有创机械通气转换时机的预测价值。
选取2022年1月至2023年7月在锦州医科大学附属第一医院重症医学科住院、诊断为AECOPD且接受无创通气(NIV)的64例患者。根据24小时内NIV结局分为NIV成功组和NIV失败组。NIV 2小时后比较两组RR/DTF、膈肌移动度(DE)、潮气量(VT)、呼吸频率(RR)、pH值、二氧化碳分压(PaCO)、痰液排出障碍等临床指标。将影响NIV失败的因素纳入二元Logistic回归分析,建立以RR/DTF为导向的风险预测模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)分析评估该模型对AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气转换时机的预测价值。
64例AECOPD患者中,NIV成功组43例,NIV失败组21例。两组患者年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、氧合指数(P/F)、吸烟史、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)等基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义,具有可比性。与NIV成功组比较,NIV失败组RR/DTF、RR、PaCO及痰液潴留显著升高,而VT和DE显著降低[RR/DTF(%):1.00±0.18 vs. 0.89±0.22,RR(次/分):21.64±3.13 vs. 19.62±2.98,PaCO(mmHg,1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa):70.82±8.82 vs. 65.29±9.47,痰液潴留:57.1% vs. 30.2%,VT(mL):308.09±14.89 vs. 324.48±23.82,DE(mm):19.91±2.94 vs. 22.05±3.30,均P<0.05]。二元Logistic回归分析显示,RR/DTF[比值比(OR)=147.989,95%置信区间(95%CI)为3.321 - 595.412,P = 0.010]、RR(OR = 1.296,95%CI为1.006 - 1.670,P = 0.045)、VT(OR = 0.966,95%CI为0.935 - 0.999,P = 0.044)、PaCO(OR = 1.086,95%CI为1.006~1.173,P = 0.035)及痰液潴留(OR = 4.533,95%CI为1.025 - 20.049,P = 0.046)是预测AECOPD患者NIV失败的独立危险因素。ROC曲线分析显示,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.713,95%CI为0.587 - 0.839(P = 0.005)。灵敏度为72.73%,特异度为88.10%,约登指数为0.394,最佳截断值为0.87。
RR/DTF风险预测模型对AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气转换时机具有较好的预测价值。