Suppr超能文献

使用拉丁字母的独特变体揭示词优效应:来自土耳其语的证据。

Revealing a word superiority effect using a unique variant of the Latin alphabet: the evidence from Turkish.

作者信息

Jordan Timothy R, Kalan Aleynanur

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ibn Haldun University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 May 23;15:1367891. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1367891. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

When visual stimuli are presented briefly, words are perceived better than nonwords. It is widely accepted that this word superiority effect reflects the efficiency with which words are perceived. However, most of what is known about the effect comes from languages (like English) using the basic Latin alphabet and little is known about whether languages using an alphabetic variant with very different properties can also produce word superiority. Here we report an experiment in which words and nonwords were presented briefly in Turkish, which uses a unique variant of the Latin alphabet containing 29 separate letters, 12 of which are close visual replications of other letters. Despite the potential for visual confusability and perceptual uncertainty, the findings revealed a clear advantage for words over nonwords, indicating that word superiority observed previously for the Latin alphabet can also be observed with the very different variant of this alphabet used for Turkish. Implications of these findings for processes involved in visual word perception are discussed.

摘要

当视觉刺激短暂呈现时,单词比非单词更容易被感知。人们普遍认为这种单词优势效应反映了单词被感知的效率。然而,关于这种效应的大多数已知信息都来自使用基本拉丁字母的语言(如英语),对于使用具有非常不同属性的字母变体的语言是否也能产生单词优势效应,人们知之甚少。在此,我们报告一项实验,在该实验中,单词和非单词在土耳其语中短暂呈现,土耳其语使用一种独特的拉丁字母变体,包含29个单独的字母,其中12个是其他字母的近似视觉复制品。尽管存在视觉混淆和感知不确定性的可能性,但研究结果显示单词相对于非单词具有明显优势,这表明之前在拉丁字母中观察到的单词优势效应,在用于土耳其语的这种非常不同的字母变体中也能观察到。我们讨论了这些发现对视觉单词感知过程的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cad1/11153851/4c22aab55239/fpsyg-15-1367891-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Revealing a word superiority effect using a unique variant of the Latin alphabet: the evidence from Turkish.
Front Psychol. 2024 May 23;15:1367891. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1367891. eCollection 2024.
2
Revealing the superior perceptibility of words in Arabic.
Perception. 2010;39(3):426-8. doi: 10.1068/p6637.
3
Assessing effects of stimulus orientation on perception of lateralized words and nonwords.
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(12):1693-702. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00326-3.
4
What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(11):1504-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.010.
5
Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform.
Brain Res. 2010 May 6;1329:159-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.084. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
7
Visual word processing efficiency for Chinese characters and English words.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Aug;238:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103986. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
8
Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Nov;5(4):657-673. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.4.657.
9
Effects of form familiarity on perception of words, pseudowords, and nonwords in the two cerebral hemispheres.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 May 15;15(4):537-48. doi: 10.1162/089892903321662921.
10
The letter height superiority illusion.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):291-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0753-8.

引用本文的文献

1

本文引用的文献

1
TURead: An eye movement dataset of Turkish reading.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1793-1816. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02120-6. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
2
Just a mark: Diacritic function does not play a role in the early stages of visual word recognition.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1530-1538. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02244-4. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
3
Letter identity and visual similarity in the processing of diacritic letters.
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):815-825. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01125-2. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Eye movement control in Turkish sentence reading.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Feb;74(2):377-397. doi: 10.1177/1747021820963310. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Shared or separated representations for letters with diacritics?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):347-352. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1503-0.
6
Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 28;7:1433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01433. eCollection 2016.
7
Fast and slow readers and the effectiveness of the spatial frequency content of text: Evidence from reading times and eye movements.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Aug;42(8):1066-71. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000234. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
8
A multistream model of visual word recognition.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):281-96. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.281.
9
Spatial frequency sensitivity differences between adults of good and poor reading ability.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;46(6):2219-24. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1247.
10
Lateralized word recognition: assessing the role of hemispheric specialization, modes of lexical access, and perceptual asymmetry.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):1192-208. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.3.1192.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验