Chakari Wahida, Bille Camilla, Lilja Caroline, Thomsen Jørn Bo
Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Research Unit for Plastic Surgery, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Gland Surg. 2024 May 30;13(5):760-774. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-397. Epub 2024 May 10.
Perforator flaps have revolutionized autologous breast reconstruction, introducing both free and pedicled options as well as the potential for combining flaps. These versatile techniques can be utilized in massive weight loss (MWL) patients, effectively addressing both functional and aesthetic challenges by using their excess skin. This review aims to explore literature on combined pedicled and free perforator flaps for total breast reconstruction, and share our own experience in the field.
A PubMed search up to June 2023 employed Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms such as (("combined") OR ("stacked") OR ("conjoined") AND ("perforator flaps")) AND ("breast reconstruction"). Publications in English and Scandinavian languages were manually screened for relevance, and supplemental sources were also reviewed.
Limited studies exist on using combined pedicled and free flaps for total breast reconstruction, although combined free flaps are more common. Perforators around the breast base, offer multiple flap options for single or combined use. In our series of 10 women, four underwent total breast reconstruction with a combination of flip-over internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap and thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap. Another subset of four, who were MWL patients, received combined TDAP and superior epigastric artery perforator (SEAP) flaps, along with body contouring procedures such as upper body lifts and vertical abdominoplasties, addressing excess skin and improving silhouette. One remaining MWL patient had deflated breasts restored using TDAP and SEAP flaps, along with an upper and lower body lift and vertical abdominoplasty. The last MWL patient underwent a risk-reducing mastectomy, also reconstructed with TDAP and SEAP flaps, and received an upper body lift and vertical abdominoplasty.
Combined perforator flap techniques for combined body contouring and breast reconstruction seems safe and especially suitable for MWL patients. They offer a surgical alternative merging body contouring and breast reconstruction in cases where free flap procedures seem less favorable due to skin laxity and deflation of donor sites. However, limited literature on the topic calls for further studies.
穿支皮瓣彻底改变了自体乳房重建技术,引入了游离和带蒂两种选择以及联合皮瓣的可能性。这些多功能技术可用于大量减重(MWL)患者,通过利用其多余的皮肤有效应对功能和美观方面的挑战。本综述旨在探讨关于联合带蒂和游离穿支皮瓣进行全乳房重建的文献,并分享我们在该领域的经验。
截至2023年6月,在PubMed上进行检索,使用医学主题词(MeSH),如((“联合”)或(“堆叠”)或(“连体”)且(“穿支皮瓣”))以及(“乳房重建”)。人工筛选英文和斯堪的纳维亚语的相关出版物,并查阅补充资料来源。
关于联合使用带蒂和游离皮瓣进行全乳房重建的研究有限,尽管联合游离皮瓣更为常见。乳房基部周围的穿支提供了多种皮瓣选择,可单独或联合使用。在我们的10例患者系列中,4例采用翻转胸廓内动脉穿支(IMAP)皮瓣和胸背动脉穿支(TDAP)皮瓣联合进行全乳房重建。另外4例大量减重患者接受了TDAP和腹壁上动脉穿支(SEAP)皮瓣联合手术,以及如上身提升术和垂直腹壁成形术等身体塑形手术,解决了多余皮肤问题并改善了身形轮廓。剩下的1例大量减重患者使用TDAP和SEAP皮瓣恢复了松弛的乳房,并进行了上下身提升术和垂直腹壁成形术。最后1例大量减重患者接受了降低风险的乳房切除术,同样采用TDAP和SEAP皮瓣进行重建,并接受了上身提升术和垂直腹壁成形术。
联合穿支皮瓣技术用于联合身体塑形和乳房重建似乎是安全的,尤其适用于大量减重患者。在因供区皮肤松弛和萎缩而游离皮瓣手术似乎不太合适的情况下,它们提供了一种将身体塑形和乳房重建相结合的手术选择。然而,关于该主题的文献有限,需要进一步研究。