Stange Eduard F
Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 23;11:1395861. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1395861. eCollection 2024.
There is agreement that inflammatory bowel diseases are, both in terms of species composition and function, associated with an altered intestinal microbiome. This is usually described by the term "dysbiosis," but this is a vague definition lacking quantitative precision. In this brief narrative review, the evidence concerning the primary or secondary role of this dysbiotic state is critically evaluated. Among others, the following facts argue against a primary etiological impact: 1) There is no specific dysbiotic microbiome in IBD, 2) the presence or absence of mucosal inflammation has a profound impact on the composition of the microbiome, 3) dysbiosis is not specific for IBD but linked to many unrelated diseases, 4) antibiotics, probiotics, and microbiome transfer have a very limited therapeutic effect, 5) the microbiome in concordant twins is similar to disease-discordant twins, and 6) the microbiome in relatives of IBD patients later developing IBD is altered, but these individuals already display subclinical inflammation.
人们一致认为,无论是在物种组成还是功能方面,炎症性肠病都与肠道微生物群的改变有关。这通常用“生态失调”一词来描述,但这是一个缺乏定量精确性的模糊定义。在这篇简短的叙述性综述中,对有关这种生态失调状态的主要或次要作用的证据进行了批判性评估。其中,以下事实反对其主要病因学影响:1)炎症性肠病中不存在特定的生态失调微生物群,2)黏膜炎症的存在与否对微生物群的组成有深远影响,3)生态失调并非炎症性肠病所特有,而是与许多不相关的疾病有关,4)抗生素、益生菌和微生物群转移的治疗效果非常有限,5)同卵双胞胎中患该病的与未患该病的微生物群相似,6)炎症性肠病患者的亲属中后来患炎症性肠病的微生物群发生了改变,但这些个体已经表现出亚临床炎症。