Lovo Stacey, Imeah Biaka, Sari Nazmi, O'Connell Megan E, Milosavljevic Steve, Angarita-Fonseca Adriana, Bath Brenna
School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Ministry of Social Services, Government of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Digit Health. 2024 Jun 5;10:20552076241260569. doi: 10.1177/20552076241260569. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Virtual care for chronic conditions has seen uptake due to COVID-19. Evaluation of virtual models is important to ensure evidence-based practice. There is a paucity of research in the use of virtual care for management of chronic back disorders. The objective of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of a team-based virtual care model for back disorder assessment where a physical therapist uses virtual care to join a nurse practitioner and patient in a rural Saskatchewan, Canada community.
Sixty-four rural adults with chronic back disorders were randomly allocated to receive either: (1) team-based virtual care ( = 24); (2) care from an urban physical therapist travelling to community ( = 20); or (3) care from a rural nurse practitioner ( = 20). The team-based care group involved a nurse practitioner located with a rural patient, and a physical therapist joining using virtual care. The physical therapist alone and the nurse practitioner alone groups received in-person assessments. Groups with a physical therapist involved had follow-up treatments by in-person physical therapy. Outcomes over six months included pain, disability, back beliefs, satisfaction, quality-adjusted health status and management-related costs.
There were no significant differences for pain, disability, back beliefs and satisfaction between groups. The average cost per patient for implementing in-person physical therapist assessment ($135) was higher compared with the team over virtual care ($118) and NP care ($59).
Primary outcomes were not different by group. Physical therapist alone was more costly than other groups. Future research should include more participants, longer follow-up time and refined cost parameters.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02225535; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02225535 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6lqLTCNF7).
由于新冠疫情,慢性病的虚拟护理得到了广泛应用。评估虚拟护理模式对于确保循证实践非常重要。目前关于使用虚拟护理管理慢性背部疾病的研究较少。本研究的目的是评估一种基于团队的虚拟护理模式在背部疾病评估中的有效性,该模式中物理治疗师通过虚拟护理与加拿大萨斯喀彻温省农村社区的执业护士和患者进行协作。
64名患有慢性背部疾病的农村成年人被随机分配接受以下治疗:(1)基于团队的虚拟护理(n = 24);(2)由城市物理治疗师前往社区提供的护理(n = 20);或(3)由农村执业护士提供的护理(n = 20)。基于团队的护理组包括一名与农村患者在一起的执业护士,以及一名通过虚拟护理参与的物理治疗师。仅物理治疗师组和仅执业护士组接受面对面评估。涉及物理治疗师的组通过面对面物理治疗进行后续治疗。六个月的结果包括疼痛、残疾、背部相关信念、满意度、质量调整后的健康状况和管理相关成本。
各组在疼痛、残疾、背部相关信念和满意度方面没有显著差异。与基于团队的虚拟护理(118美元)和执业护士护理(59美元)相比,实施面对面物理治疗师评估的每位患者平均成本(135美元)更高。
主要结果在各组之间没有差异。仅物理治疗师的成本高于其他组。未来的研究应纳入更多参与者、更长的随访时间和更精确的成本参数。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02225535;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02225535(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6lqLTCNF7)