Departments of Pathology.
Radiology.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2024 Jul 1;32(6):264-271. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001209. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
There is a limited amount of data on the role of programmed cell death ligand (PD-L) -1 and PD-L2 in salivary gland carcinomas. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expressions, which are closely related to immune mechanisms, with respect to salivary gland tumor types and stages. Data from patients with salivary gland masses surgically removed between 2006 and 2021, diagnosed with a malignant salivary gland neoplasm, were retrospectively analyzed. Immunoreactivity for PD-L1 and PD-L2 was performed on resection materials. The mean age of 90 patients was 52.1±18.8 and 46.7% were male. Overall, 55.6% of patients were diagnosed with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), 23.3% with mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), 16.7% with acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC), 3.3% with ductal carcinoma (DC), and 1 patient with pleomorphic adenoma ex carcinoma (PA-ex-CA). In all, 52% of ACC, 12% of AciCC, 24% of MEC, and 12% of DC cases were at stage IV. The tumor diameter, frequencies of lymphovascular invasion, metastasis, positive surgical margin, recurrence, and mortality rates of patients at stages III and IV were significantly larger than those at stages I and II ( P <0.05). The percentages of tumor cell score (TCS) and immune cell score (ICS) for PD-L1 were significantly higher among patients with MEC compared with those with other types of tumors ( P =0.0011). However, the percentages of combined score (CS) for PD-L1 and tumor cell score for PD-L2 were comparable among tumor types ( P >0.05). No significant difference was found in these scores for PD-L1 between tumor stages ( P >0.05), but for PD-L2, all patients at stage I had TCS <1% for PD-L2, while all patients at stages II and III, and 92% of patients at stage IV had TCS ≥1% ( P <0.0001). High expression of PD-L1 was mostly observed in MEC cases ( P =0.0016), while all patients with AciCC had a low PD-L1 expression level ( P =0.0206). The mean tumor diameter, rate of lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, metastasis, positive surgical margin, recurrence, type of treatment, mortality, and TILs ratio did not differ significantly according to PD-L1 expression level ( P >0.05). The percentage of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was comparable among negative and positive PD-L1 scores according to both 1% and 5% threshold values ( P >0.05). High PD-L1 expression is rare in AciCC, while PD-L1 expression is high in MEC. Our findings underline the importance of future screening for PD-L1 and PD-L2 before patients undergoing immunotherapies in all salivary gland tumors.
关于唾液腺癌中程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)和 PD-L2 的作用,目前仅有有限的数据。我们旨在评估 PD-L1 和 PD-L2 表达的预后价值,这些表达与免疫机制密切相关,涉及唾液腺肿瘤类型和分期。对 2006 年至 2021 年间手术切除的唾液腺肿块患者的数据进行回顾性分析,这些患者被诊断为恶性唾液腺肿瘤。对 PD-L1 和 PD-L2 的免疫反应性在切除标本上进行检测。90 例患者的平均年龄为 52.1±18.8 岁,其中 46.7%为男性。总体而言,55.6%的患者被诊断为腺样囊性癌(ACC),23.3%为黏液表皮样癌(MEC),16.7%为腺泡细胞癌(AciCC),3.3%为导管癌(DC),1 例为多形性腺瘤伴癌(PA-ex-CA)。在所有 ACC 中,52%,AciCC 中 12%,MEC 中 24%,DC 中 12%为 IV 期。III 期和 IV 期患者的肿瘤直径、脉管侵犯频率、转移、阳性切缘、复发和死亡率明显大于 I 期和 II 期(P<0.05)。与其他类型的肿瘤相比,MEC 患者的 PD-L1 肿瘤细胞评分(TCS)和免疫细胞评分(ICS)百分比明显更高(P=0.0011)。然而,PD-L1 的联合评分(CS)和 PD-L2 的肿瘤细胞评分在肿瘤类型之间相当(P>0.05)。PD-L1 肿瘤分期之间的这些评分没有显著差异(P>0.05),但对于 PD-L2,所有 I 期患者的 PD-L2 TCS<1%,而所有 II 期和 III 期患者以及 92%的 IV 期患者的 PD-L2 TCS≥1%(P<0.0001)。高 PD-L1 表达主要见于 MEC 病例(P=0.0016),而所有 AciCC 患者的 PD-L1 表达水平均较低(P=0.0206)。根据 PD-L1 表达水平,肿瘤直径、脉管侵犯率、神经周围侵犯、转移、阳性切缘、复发、治疗类型、死亡率和 TIL 比值均无显著差异(P>0.05)。根据 1%和 5%的阈值,PD-L1 阴性和阳性评分的肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞百分比相当(P>0.05)。AciCC 中 PD-L1 高表达罕见,而 MEC 中 PD-L1 表达高。我们的研究结果强调了在所有唾液腺肿瘤患者接受免疫治疗之前,对 PD-L1 和 PD-L2 进行前瞻性筛查的重要性。