• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稳态噪声和脉冲噪声致聋的对比分析。

Comparative analysis of hearing loss caused by steady-state noise and impulse noise.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, PLA Strategic Support Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, China.

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Work. 2024;79(2):653-660. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230066.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-230066
PMID:38848149
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Varied noise environments, such as impulse noise and steady-state noise, may induce distinct patterns of hearing impairment among personnel exposed to prolonged noise. However, comparative studies on these effects remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to delineate the different characteristics of hearing loss in workers exposed to steady-state noise and impulse noise.

METHODS

As of December 2020, 96 workers exposed to steady-state noise and 177 workers exposed to impulse noise were assessed. Hearing loss across various frequencies was measured using pure tone audiometry and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) audiometry.

RESULTS

Both groups of workers exposed to steady-state noise and impulse noise exhibited high frequencies hearing loss. The steady-state noise group displayed significantly greater hearing loss at lower frequencies in the early stages, spanning 1- 5 years of work (P < 0.05). Among individuals exposed to impulse noise for extended periods (over 10 years), the observed hearing loss surpassed that of the steady-state noise group, displaying a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Hearing loss resulting from both steady-state noise and impulse noise predominantly occurs at high frequencies. Early exposure to steady-state noise induces more pronounced hearing loss at speech frequencies compared to impulse noise.

摘要

背景

在长期暴露于噪声环境下的人员中,脉冲噪声和稳态噪声等不同噪声环境可能会导致不同类型的听力损伤。然而,针对这些影响的比较研究仍然有限。

目的

本研究旨在描述稳态噪声和脉冲噪声暴露工人的听力损失的不同特征。

方法

截至 2020 年 12 月,评估了 96 名暴露于稳态噪声的工人和 177 名暴露于脉冲噪声的工人。使用纯音测听和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)测听评估各种频率的听力损失。

结果

稳态噪声和脉冲噪声暴露组的工人均表现出高频听力损失。稳态噪声组在工作 1-5 年内(P<0.05),在低频段表现出更明显的早期听力损失。在长期(超过 10 年)暴露于脉冲噪声的人群中,观察到的听力损失超过了稳态噪声组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

稳态噪声和脉冲噪声引起的听力损失主要发生在高频。早期暴露于稳态噪声会导致语音频率的听力损失比脉冲噪声更明显。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of hearing loss caused by steady-state noise and impulse noise.稳态噪声和脉冲噪声致聋的对比分析。
Work. 2024;79(2):653-660. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230066.
2
Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and pure tone audiometry in occupational screening for auditory deficit due to noise exposure.畸变产物耳声发射与纯音听力测定在职业性噪声暴露所致听力损失筛查中的比较
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Dec;129(12):1174-81. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115002790. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
3
Distortion product oto-acoustic emission: a superior tool for hearing assessment than pure tone audiometry.畸变产物耳声发射:一种比纯音听力测定更优越的听力评估工具。
Noise Health. 2019 Jul-Aug;21(101):164-168. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_37_19.
4
[Study on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and expanded high frequency audiometry in noise exposure workers].噪声暴露工人的畸变产物耳声发射与扩展高频听力测定研究
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Jan;17(1):16-9.
5
Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in an industrial setting.工业环境中的畸变产物耳声发射
Noise Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;11(43):103-10. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.50695.
6
Distortion-product otoacoustic emission spectra and high-resolution audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss.噪声性听力损失中的畸变产物耳声发射频谱与高分辨率听力测定
Hear Res. 2005 Nov;209(1-2):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.06.008. Epub 2005 Aug 19.
7
Auditory monitoring by means of evaluation of the cochlea in soldiers of the Brazilian Army exposed to impulse noise.通过对暴露于脉冲噪声的巴西陆军士兵的耳蜗进行评估来进行听觉监测。
Int Tinnitus J. 2011;16(2):123-9.
8
The effect of impulse noise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.脉冲噪声对畸变产物耳声发射的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2005 Sep;44(9):540-9. doi: 10.1080/14992020500190201.
9
[Distortion product otoacoustic emissions before and after one year exposure to impulse noise].[暴露于脉冲噪声一年前后的畸变产物耳声发射]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2006;60(2):243-7.
10
[Impulse noise influence on hearing].[脉冲噪声对听力的影响]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2005 Sep;19(111):296-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational epidemiological characteristics of noise-induced hearing loss and the impact of combined exposure to noise and dust on workers' hearing-a retrospective study.噪声性听力损失的职业流行病学特征及噪声与粉尘联合暴露对工人听力的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;12:1488065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488065. eCollection 2024.