Suppr超能文献

学术型儿科急诊分诊差异及按种族、民族和语言提供护理的差异

Triage Discordance in an Academic Pediatric Emergency Department and Disparities by Race, Ethnicity, and Language for Care.

机构信息

Pediatric Emergency Medicine.

Clinical Analytics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 1;40(10):681-687. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003211. Epub 2024 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minoritized patients are disproportionately represented in low-acuity emergency department (ED) visits in the United States in part caused by lack of timely access to primary and urgent care. However, there is also the possibility that implicit bias during triage could contribute to disproportionate representation of minority groups in low-acuity ED visits. Triage discordance, defined as when ED resources used are different from initial triage score predictions, can be used as a proxy for triage accuracy. Recent data suggest that discordant triage may be common, although little is known about the interaction with race, ethnicity, and language for care.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine the prevalence of discordant triage among moderate- and low-acuity pediatric ED encounters and the interaction with patient race, ethnicity, and language for care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric ED encounters from 2019 with Emergency Severity Index (ESI) scores of 3, 4, or 5 at an academic referral hospital. The primary outcome was triage discordance, encompassing overtriage (ESI 3 and 4) and undertriage (ESI 4 and 5). Logistic and multinomial regressions were used to assess discordant triage by race, ethnicity, and language group.

RESULTS

Triage discordance occurred in 47% (n = 18,040) of encounters. Black and Hispanic patients had higher likelihood of undertriage for ESI 5 (adjusted odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.46 and 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.52, respectively), and Black patients were more likely to be overtriaged in ESI 3 (1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.27). Those with a language other than English for care had higher proportions of overtriage for ESI 3 (1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12) and undertriage for ESI 5 (1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.37).

CONCLUSIONS

We found high rates of triage discordance in our pediatric ED, with significant associations with race, ethnicity, and language for care. Future research should evaluate the source of triage discordance and develop quality improvement efforts to improve equitable care.

摘要

背景

在美国,少数族裔患者在低 acuity 急诊就诊中不成比例地占比过高,部分原因是他们无法及时获得初级和紧急护理。然而,分诊过程中的隐性偏见也有可能导致少数群体在低 acuity ED 就诊中不成比例地占比过高。分诊不一致性,即 ED 资源的使用与初始分诊评分预测不同,可以作为分诊准确性的替代指标。最近的数据表明,分诊不一致性可能很常见,尽管对于种族、族裔和语言与护理的相互作用知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在确定中度和低度 acuity 儿科 ED 就诊中分诊不一致的发生率,以及与患者种族、族裔和语言对护理的相互作用。

方法

我们对一家学术转诊医院 2019 年的儿科 ED 就诊进行了回顾性分析,就诊的患者的紧急严重程度指数(ESI)评分为 3、4 或 5。主要结局是分诊不一致,包括过分诊(ESI 3 和 4)和分诊不足(ESI 4 和 5)。使用逻辑回归和多项回归评估按种族、族裔和语言群体进行的分诊不一致。

结果

47%(n=18040)的就诊出现了分诊不一致。黑人患者和西班牙裔患者更有可能出现 ESI 5 的分诊不足(调整后的优势比 1.21,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.01-1.46 和 1.27,95% CI 1.07-1.52),黑人患者更有可能在 ESI 3 中出现过分诊(1.18,95% CI 1.09-1.27)。以英语以外的语言就诊的患者,ESI 3 的过分诊比例更高(1.08,95% CI 1.04-1.12),ESI 5 的分诊不足比例更高(1.23,95% CI 1.11-1.37)。

结论

我们在儿科 ED 中发现了高比例的分诊不一致,与种族、族裔和语言对护理的使用有显著关联。未来的研究应该评估分诊不一致的原因,并制定质量改进措施,以改善公平护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验