Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;363:121345. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121345. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
Despite the increasing popularity of the circular economy, there remains a lack of consensus on how to quantify circularity, a critical aspect of the practical implementation of this model. To address this gap, this article examines the industry's perspective and efforts toward implementing the circular economy in real-world scenarios. We conducted 40 interviews with engineers, project leaders, and top-level managers in the Australian construction sector. Using Saldaña's coding approach, we analysed their views on circular economy practices and efforts within their organisations. Our findings reveal while waste minimisation, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and cost considerations are widely regarded as essential indicators of a successful circular economy model, the significance of waste storage and long-term stockpiling while awaiting treatment has been overlooked or under-emphasised in industry practices and academic literature. Stockpiling of waste has often been seen as a staging process in waste treatment. However, based on industry insights, it accumulates to the point of mismanagement when it becomes a safety and environmental concern. Addressing this oversight, we propose a storage circularity indicator that allows incorporating waste storage and stockpiling in circular economy models. Our research contributes to various environmental and waste management aspects, supporting policies and strategies for solid waste management and excessive stockpile prevention. By emphasising the significance of storage circularity, we clarify waste prevention techniques and address socio-economic issues such as the urgent need to reduce long-term stockpiling of solid waste. This work highlights the importance of decision-support tools in waste management to facilitate the implementation of circular economy principles. Our proposed storage circularity indicator promotes industrial collaboration, aligning with the concept of industrial symbiosis to optimise resource use and minimise waste generation. By discussing these topics, we aim to contribute to the advancement of more robust waste management strategies and policies that promote sustainable production and consumption practices.
尽管循环经济越来越受欢迎,但如何量化循环性仍缺乏共识,而这是该模式实际实施的关键方面。为了解决这一差距,本文探讨了业界在现实场景中实施循环经济的观点和努力。我们对澳大利亚建筑行业的 40 名工程师、项目负责人和高层管理人员进行了采访。我们使用萨尔达尼亚的编码方法分析了他们对循环经济实践及其组织内努力的看法。我们的研究结果表明,虽然废物最小化、减少温室气体排放和成本考虑被广泛认为是成功的循环经济模型的重要指标,但在行业实践和学术文献中,废物储存和长期囤积以备处理的重要性被忽视或被低估。废物囤积通常被视为废物处理的一个阶段过程。然而,根据行业的观点,当废物堆积到管理不善的程度,成为安全和环境问题时,就会积累起来。为了解决这一疏忽,我们提出了一个储存循环性指标,该指标允许将废物储存和囤积纳入循环经济模型。我们的研究对各种环境和废物管理方面做出了贡献,为固体废物管理和防止过度囤积提供了政策和战略支持。通过强调储存循环性的重要性,我们澄清了废物预防技术,并解决了社会经济问题,例如迫切需要减少固体废物的长期囤积。这项工作强调了决策支持工具在废物管理中的重要性,以促进循环经济原则的实施。我们提出的储存循环性指标促进了工业合作,符合工业共生的理念,以优化资源利用并减少废物生成。通过讨论这些主题,我们旨在为更强大的废物管理策略和政策的发展做出贡献,这些策略和政策促进可持续生产和消费实践。