Lefaucheur Jean-Pascal, Moro Elena, Shirota Yuichiro, Ugawa Yoshikazu, Grippe Talyta, Chen Robert, Benninger David H, Jabbari Bahman, Attaripour Sanaz, Hallett Mark, Paulus Walter
Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France; EA 4391, ENT Team, Paris-Est Créteil University, Créteil, France.
Grenoble Alpes University, Division of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, Grenoble, France.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2024 Aug;164:57-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 May 23.
In this review, different aspects of the use of clinical neurophysiology techniques for the treatment of movement disorders are addressed. First of all, these techniques can be used to guide neuromodulation techniques or to perform therapeutic neuromodulation as such. Neuromodulation includes invasive techniques based on the surgical implantation of electrodes and a pulse generator, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) or spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the one hand, and non-invasive techniques aimed at modulating or even lesioning neural structures by transcranial application. Movement disorders are one of the main areas of indication for the various neuromodulation techniques. This review focuses on the following techniques: DBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and focused ultrasound (FUS), including high-intensity magnetic resonance-guided FUS (MRgFUS), and pulsed mode low-intensity transcranial FUS stimulation (TUS). The main clinical conditions in which neuromodulation has proven its efficacy are Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, mainly using DBS or MRgFUS. There is also some evidence for Tourette syndrome (DBS), Huntington's disease (DBS), cerebellar ataxia (tDCS), and axial signs (SCS) and depression (rTMS) in PD. The development of non-invasive transcranial neuromodulation techniques is limited by the short-term clinical impact of these techniques, especially rTMS, in the context of very chronic diseases. However, at-home use (tDCS) or current advances in the design of closed-loop stimulation (tACS) may open new perspectives for the application of these techniques in patients, favored by their easier use and lower rate of adverse effects compared to invasive or lesioning methods. Finally, this review summarizes the evidence for keeping the use of electromyography to optimize the identification of muscles to be treated with botulinum toxin injection, which is indicated and widely performed for the treatment of various movement disorders.
在本综述中,探讨了临床神经生理学技术用于治疗运动障碍的不同方面。首先,这些技术可用于指导神经调节技术或直接进行治疗性神经调节。神经调节一方面包括基于电极和脉冲发生器手术植入的侵入性技术,如深部脑刺激(DBS)或脊髓刺激(SCS),另一方面包括通过经颅应用来调节甚至损伤神经结构的非侵入性技术。运动障碍是各种神经调节技术的主要适应证领域之一。本综述重点关注以下技术:DBS、重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、低强度经颅电刺激,包括经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅交流电刺激(tACS),以及聚焦超声(FUS),包括高强度磁共振引导FUS(MRgFUS)和脉冲模式低强度经颅FUS刺激(TUS)。神经调节已证明其疗效的主要临床病症是帕金森病、肌张力障碍和特发性震颤,主要使用DBS或MRgFUS。对于抽动秽语综合征(DBS)、亨廷顿病(DBS)、小脑共济失调(tDCS)以及帕金森病中的轴向体征(SCS)和抑郁症(rTMS)也有一些证据。非侵入性经颅神经调节技术的发展受到这些技术(尤其是rTMS)在非常慢性疾病背景下短期临床影响的限制。然而,在家使用(tDCS)或闭环刺激设计(tACS)方面的当前进展可能为这些技术在患者中的应用开辟新的前景,与侵入性或损伤性方法相比,它们使用更简便且不良反应发生率更低。最后,本综述总结了使用肌电图以优化肉毒毒素注射治疗肌肉识别的证据,肉毒毒素注射用于治疗各种运动障碍已得到广泛应用。