Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Departmen of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Aug;22(4):102119. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102119. Epub 2024 May 10.
Trimodal therapy (TMT) is guideline-recommended for the management of organ confined urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB). However, temporal trends in TMT use and cancer-specific mortality free-survival (CSM-FS) between historical TMT versus contemporary TMT have not been assessed. We addressed this knowledge gap.
Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified nonmetastatic UCUB patients with cT2-T4aN0-N2 treated with TMT, defined as the combination of transurethral resection of bladder tumor, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Temporal trends described TMT use over time. Subsequently, patients were divided between historical (2004-2012) versus contemporary (2013-2020) cohorts. Survival analyses consisting of Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM-FS. Separate analyses addressed patients with organ confined (OC: cT2N0M0) versus nonorgan confined (NOC: cT3-4a and/or cN1-2) clinical stages.
Of 4,097 assessable UCUB TMT patients, 1744 (43%) were treated in the historical period (2004-2012) versus 2353 (58%) in the contemporary period (2013-2020). TMT use increased over time in OC patients (EAPC:+3.4%, P < .001), as well as in NOC (EAPC:+2.7%, P < .001). In OC stage, median CSM-FS was 55.3% in historical versus 49.0% in contemporary patients (HR:0.75, P < .001). Similarly, in NOC stage, 5-year median CSM-FS was 43.0% in historical versus 32.8% in contemporary patients (HR:0.78, P = .01).
TMT rates have increased over time in both OC and NOC patients. Contemporary TMT patients benefit of better cancer-specific survival. Interestingly, this benefit applies equally to OC and NOC TMT-treated patients.
多模式治疗(TMT)是治疗局限于器官的膀胱尿路上皮癌(UCUB)的指南推荐治疗方法。然而,历史 TMT 与当代 TMT 之间 TMT 使用的时间趋势和癌症特异性无病生存(CSM-FS)尚未得到评估。我们解决了这一知识空白。
在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(2004-2020 年)中,我们确定了接受 TMT 治疗的局限性非转移性 UCUB 患者,TMT 定义为经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术、化疗和放疗的联合治疗。时间趋势描述了随时间推移 TMT 的使用情况。随后,患者被分为历史组(2004-2012 年)和当代组(2013-2020 年)。生存分析包括 Kaplan-Meier 图和多变量 Cox 回归(MCR)模型,以评估 CSM-FS。单独的分析针对局限性(OC:cT2N0M0)和非局限性(NOC:cT3-4a 和/或 cN1-2)临床分期的患者。
在 4097 例可评估的 UCUB TMT 患者中,1744 例(43%)在历史时期(2004-2012 年)接受治疗,2353 例(58%)在当代时期(2013-2020 年)接受治疗。OC 患者 TMT 的使用随着时间的推移而增加(EAPC:+3.4%,P<.001),NOC 患者也是如此(EAPC:+2.7%,P<.001)。在 OC 分期中,历史组的中位 CSM-FS 为 55.3%,当代组为 49.0%(HR:0.75,P<.001)。同样,在 NOC 分期中,历史组的 5 年中位 CSM-FS 为 43.0%,当代组为 32.8%(HR:0.78,P=0.01)。
OC 和 NOC 患者的 TMT 使用率随着时间的推移而增加。当代 TMT 患者的癌症特异性生存获益更好。有趣的是,这种获益同样适用于 OC 和 NOC TMT 治疗的患者。