Suppr超能文献

关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后复发的危险因素:系统评价。

Risk factors for recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Nov;33(11):2539-2549. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrent instability remains a major source of morbidity following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Many risk factors and predictive tools have been described, but there remains a lack of consensus surrounding individual risk factors and their contribution to outcomes. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature to identify and quantify risk factors for recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE databases based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated risk factors for recurrent instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair.

RESULTS

Overall, 111 studies were included in the analysis, including a total of 19,307 patients and 2750 episodes of recurrent instability with 45 risk factors described. Age at operation was reported by 60 studies, with 35 finding increased risk at younger ages. Meta-analysis showed a 2-fold recurrence rate of 27.0% (171 of 634) for patients <20 years old compared with 13.3% (197 of 1485) for older patients (P < .001). Seventeen studies completed multivariable analysis, 13 of which were significant (odds ratio 1.3-14.0). Glenoid bone loss was evaluated by 39 studies, with 20 finding an increased risk. Multivariable analysis in 9 studies found odds ratios ranging from 0.7 to 35.1; 6 were significant. Off-track Hill-Sachs lesions were evaluated in 21 studies (13 significant), with 3 of 4 studies that conducted multivariable analysis finding a significant association with odds ratio of 2.9-8.9 of recurrence. The number of anchors used in repair was reported by 25 studies, with 4 finding increased risk with fewer anchors. Pooled analysis demonstrated a 25.0% (29 of 156) risk of recurrence with 2 anchors, compared with 18.1% (89 of 491) with 3 or more anchors (P = .06). Other frequently described risk factors included glenohumeral joint hyperlaxity (46% of studies reporting a significant association), number of preoperative dislocations (31%), contact sport participation (20%), competitive sport participation (46%), patient sex (7%), and concomitant superior labral anterior-posterior tear (0%).

CONCLUSION

Younger age, glenoid bone loss, and off-track Hill-Sachs lesions are established risk factors for recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Other commonly reported risk factors included contact and competitive sports participation, number of fixation devices, and patient sex.

摘要

背景

关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后复发性不稳定仍然是主要的发病源。已经描述了许多风险因素和预测工具,但在个体风险因素及其对结果的贡献方面仍存在共识。本研究的目的是系统地回顾文献,以确定和量化关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后复发的风险因素。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南,使用 PubMed/MEDLINE 数据库进行文献检索。如果研究评估了关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后复发性不稳定的风险因素,则将其纳入分析。

结果

总体而言,有 111 项研究被纳入分析,包括 19307 名患者和 2750 例复发性不稳定事件,共描述了 45 个风险因素。60 项研究报告了手术时的年龄,其中 35 项研究发现年龄较小的患者风险增加。荟萃分析显示,20 岁以下患者的复发率为 27.0%(634 例中的 171 例),而 20 岁以上患者的复发率为 13.3%(1485 例中的 197 例)(P<.001)。17 项研究完成了多变量分析,其中 13 项具有统计学意义(优势比 1.3-14.0)。39 项研究评估了肩盂骨丢失,其中 20 项研究发现风险增加。9 项研究中的多变量分析发现比值比范围为 0.7 至 35.1;其中 6 项具有统计学意义。21 项研究评估了脱轨 Hill-Sachs 病变(13 项有意义),其中 4 项进行多变量分析的研究发现与复发的比值比有显著关联,为 2.9-8.9。25 项研究报告了修复中使用的锚钉数量,其中 4 项研究发现锚钉数量较少与风险增加相关。汇总分析显示,使用 2 个锚钉的复发风险为 25.0%(156 例中的 29 例),而使用 3 个或更多锚钉的复发风险为 18.1%(491 例中的 89 例)(P=0.06)。其他经常描述的风险因素包括肩盂肱关节过度松弛(46%的研究报告存在显著关联)、术前脱位次数(31%)、接触性运动参与(20%)、竞技性运动参与(46%)、患者性别(7%)和伴随的上盂唇前-后撕裂(0%)。

结论

年轻、肩盂骨丢失和脱轨 Hill-Sachs 病变是关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后复发的既定风险因素。其他常见的报告风险因素包括接触性和竞技性运动参与、固定装置数量和患者性别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验