Optical coherence tomography to optimize results of coronary interventions. Evidence-based?
作者信息
Alfonso Fernando, Marschall Alexander, Val David Del
机构信息
Department of Cardiology. Hospital, Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
出版信息
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 May 14;52:101400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101400. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Optical coherence tomography to optimize results of coronary interventions. Evidence-based?
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 May 14;52:101400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101400. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Letter by Nadir Regarding Article, "Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting)".
Circulation. 2017 Feb 28;135(9):e138-e139. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025486.
3
Letter by Vallurupalli and Uretsky Regarding Article, "Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting)".
Circulation. 2017 Feb 28;135(9):e140-e141. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025743.
4
Response by Meneveau and Ecarnot to Letter Regarding Article, "Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting)".
Circulation. 2017 Feb 28;135(9):e142-e143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026277.
5
Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting).
Circulation. 2016 Sep 27;134(13):906-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024393. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
6
Co-registration of optical coherence tomography and X-ray angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention. the Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization (DOCTOR) fusion study.
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 1;182:272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.088. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
7
Fractional flow reserve or optical coherence tomography guidance to revascularize intermediate coronary stenosis using angioplasty (FORZA) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trials. 2014 Apr 23;15:140. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-140.
8
[Role of optical coherence tomography to optimize complex coronary interventions].
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2020 Apr;21(4 Suppl 2):12S-21S. doi: 10.1714/3336.33069.
9
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence and Clinical Trials.
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2023 Apr;12(2):225-236. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2022.12.004. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
10
Techniques to Optimize the Use of Optical Coherence Tomography: Insights from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Jun;20(6):507-512. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
本文引用的文献
1
Quantitative Coronary Angiography vs Intravascular Ultrasonography to Guide Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 May 1;9(5):428-435. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0059.
2
Intravascular imaging-guided coronary drug-eluting stent implantation: an updated network meta-analysis.
Lancet. 2024 Mar 2;403(10429):824-837. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02454-6. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
3
Coronary Angiography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography for Guiding of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Circulation. 2024 Apr 2;149(14):1065-1086. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067583. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
4
Clinical outcomes of optical coherence tomography versus conventional angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis.
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Feb;49(2):102224. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102224. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
Comparison of Intravascular Imaging, Functional, or Angiographically Guided Coronary Intervention.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Dec 5;82(23):2167-2176. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.823. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
6
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1466-1476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305861. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
7
OCT or Angiography Guidance for PCI in Complex Bifurcation Lesions.
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1477-1487. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307770. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
8
Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100 Suppl 1:S44-S56. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30416. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
9
Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions.
EuroIntervention. 2018 Aug 20;14(6):656-677. doi: 10.4244/EIJY18M06_01.
10
Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 26;10(24):2488-2498. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.051. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
Zotero 插件