Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, South Carolina, United States.
Wolf Conservation Center, South Salem, New York, United States.
PeerJ. 2024 Jun 4;12:e17457. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17457. eCollection 2024.
For many species, the relationship between space use and diet composition is complex, with individuals adopting varying space use strategies such as territoriality to facilitate resource acquisition. Coyotes () exhibit two disparate types of space use; defending mutually exclusive territories (residents) or moving nomadically across landscapes (transients). Resident coyotes have increased access to familiar food resources, thus improved foraging opportunities to compensate for the energetic costs of defending territories. Conversely, transients do not defend territories and are able to redirect energetic costs of territorial defense towards extensive movements in search of mates and breeding opportunities. These differences in space use attributed to different behavioral strategies likely influence foraging and ultimately diet composition, but these relationships have not been well studied. We investigated diet composition of resident and transient coyotes in the southeastern United States by pairing individual space use patterns with analysis of stable carbon (δC) and nitrogen (δN) isotope values to assess diet. During 2016-2017, we monitored 41 coyotes (26 residents, 15 transients) with GPS radio-collars along the Savannah River area in the southeastern United States. We observed a canopy effect on δC values and little anthropogenic food in coyote diets, suggesting C enrichment is likely more influenced by reduced canopy cover than consumption of human foods. We also observed other land cover effects, such as agricultural cover and road density, on δN values as well as reduced space used by coyotes, suggesting that cover types and localized, resident-like space use can influence the degree of carnivory in coyotes. Finally, diets and niche space did not differ between resident and transient coyotes despite differences observed in the proportional contribution of potential food sources to their diets. Although our stable isotope mixing models detected differences between the diets of resident and transient coyotes, both relied mostly on mammalian prey (52.8%, SD = 15.9 for residents, 42.0%, SD = 15.6 for transients). Resident coyotes consumed more game birds (21.3%, SD = 11.6 13.7%, SD = 8.8) and less fruit (10.5%, SD = 6.9 21.3%, SD = 10.7) and insects (7.2%, SD = 4.7 14.3%, SD = 8.5) than did transients. Our findings indicate that coyote populations fall on a feeding continuum of omnivory to carnivory in which variability in feeding strategies is influenced by land cover characteristics and space use behaviors.
对于许多物种来说,空间利用和饮食组成之间的关系是复杂的,个体采用不同的空间利用策略,如领地性,以促进资源的获取。郊狼()表现出两种截然不同的空间利用方式;保卫相互排斥的领地(居民)或在景观中游牧(过境)。居民郊狼有更多机会获得熟悉的食物资源,因此有更好的觅食机会来弥补保卫领地的能量成本。相反,过境者不保卫领地,能够将保卫领地的能量成本转移到广泛的运动中,以寻找配偶和繁殖机会。这些归因于不同行为策略的空间利用差异可能会影响觅食,最终影响饮食组成,但这些关系尚未得到很好的研究。我们通过将个体空间利用模式与稳定碳(δC)和氮(δN)同位素值分析相结合,研究了美国东南部居民和过境郊狼的饮食组成,以评估饮食。在 2016-2017 年期间,我们在佐治亚州东南部的萨凡纳河地区使用 GPS 无线电项圈监测了 41 只郊狼(26 只居民,15 只过境)。我们观察到树冠对δC 值有影响,郊狼的饮食中很少有人工食物,这表明 C 富集可能更多地受到树冠覆盖减少的影响,而不是食用人类食物的影响。我们还观察到其他土地覆盖物对δN 值的影响,如农业覆盖物和道路密度,以及郊狼使用空间的减少,这表明覆盖类型和局部、居民般的空间利用可以影响郊狼的肉食程度。最后,尽管观察到潜在食物来源对其饮食的贡献比例存在差异,但居民和过境郊狼的饮食和生态位空间并没有差异。尽管我们的稳定同位素混合模型检测到了居民和过境郊狼饮食之间的差异,但两者主要依赖于哺乳动物猎物(居民为 52.8%,SD=15.9;过境为 42.0%,SD=15.6)。居民郊狼消耗更多的猎禽(21.3%,SD=11.6 13.7%,SD=8.8)和更少的水果(10.5%,SD=6.9 21.3%,SD=10.7)和昆虫(7.2%,SD=4.7 14.3%,SD=8.5)比过境者。我们的发现表明,郊狼种群处于杂食性到肉食性的摄食连续体中,其中摄食策略的可变性受土地覆盖特征和空间利用行为的影响。