Peek Kerry, Ross Andrew, Andersen Thor Einar, Meyer Tim, Dahlen Sara, Georgieva Julia, Williamson Paula R, Clarke Mike, Serner Andreas
Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Physiotherapy Department, College of Sport, Health and Engineering, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sci Med Footb. 2024 Jun 10:1-18. doi: 10.1080/24733938.2024.2362191.
The primary objective of this systematic review was to describe the number and type of heading descriptors used in all published studies which report on heading incidence in football. The secondary objective was to detail the data collection and reporting methods used in the included studies to present heading incidence data. Eligible studies were identified through searches of five electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science, using a combination of free-text keywords (inception to 12th September 2023). Manual searching of reference lists and retrieved systematic reviews was also performed. A descriptive overview and synthesis of the results is presented. From 1620 potentially eligible studies, 71 studies were included, with the following key findings: 1) only 61% of studies defined a header with even fewer (23%) providing an operational definition of a header within the methods; 2) important study and player demographic data including year and country were often not reported; 3) reported heading descriptors and their coding options varied greatly; 4) visual identification of headers was essential when inertial measurement units were used to collect heading incidence data; and 5) there was a lack of standardisation in the reporting methods used in heading incidence studies making comparison between studies challenging. To address these findings, the development of a standardised, internationally supported, operational definition of a header and related heading descriptors should be prioritised. Further recommendations include the development of minimum reporting criteria for heading incidence research.
本系统评价的主要目的是描述所有已发表的关于足球顶球发生率研究中使用的标题描述符的数量和类型。次要目的是详细说明纳入研究中用于呈现顶球发生率数据的数据收集和报告方法。通过检索五个电子数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science),结合自由文本关键词(截至2023年9月12日),确定符合条件的研究。还对手动检索参考文献列表和检索到的系统评价进行了操作。对结果进行了描述性概述和综合分析。从1620项潜在符合条件的研究中,纳入了71项研究,主要发现如下:1)只有61%的研究定义了头球,甚至更少(23%)的研究在方法中提供了头球的操作定义;2)重要研究和球员人口统计数据,包括年份和国家,往往未被报告;3)报告的顶球描述符及其编码选项差异很大;4)当使用惯性测量单元收集顶球发生率数据时,通过视觉识别头球至关重要;5)顶球发生率研究中使用的报告方法缺乏标准化,使得研究之间的比较具有挑战性。为了解决这些发现,应优先制定标准化的、得到国际支持的头球操作定义和相关顶球描述符。进一步的建议包括制定顶球发生率研究的最低报告标准。