From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center.
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Jun 1;92(6S Suppl 4):S379-S381. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003955.
Many techniques exist to reapproximate a cleft lip but can leave unsatisfactory results with nonanatomic scars and a short upper lip, creating a need for revision. Many revisions focus on adjacent tissue transfers and realignment of landmarks, but in the senior authors' experience, recreating the defect and utilizing the Fisher repair for revision have led to aesthetically pleasing results and less noticeable scars. A database was collected that included all cleft lip revisions performed at a large, comprehensive children's hospital from October 2018 to July 2021. Inclusion criteria included any cleft patient with a cleft lip revision performed by two craniofacial surgeons. Data collected included sex, characteristics of the cleft lip, age at initial and index repair, type of initial repair, previous revisions, type of revision with any additional tissue rearrangement, and any nose repair. Sixty-five patients were included in the study for analysis. The type of initial repair was known in sixty-four cases (98%), and fifty-four were Millard repairs (83%). Twenty-two patients (33%) had a previous revision prior to their index revision. Sixty patients (92%) underwent the Fisher repair technique for their index revision and forty-six patients (70%) underwent nasal revision. In follow-up, all patients demonstrated an improvement in lip aesthetics. This study demonstrates a large subset of patients that have undergone cleft lip revision using the Fisher technique. In the senior surgeons' experience, the Fisher repair technique in the setting of cleft lip revision is an ideal way to address the shortcomings of historical repair techniques.
有许多技术可用于重新近似唇裂,但可能会留下不理想的结果,出现非解剖学的疤痕和短上唇,从而需要进行修复。许多修复术侧重于相邻组织转移和标志的重新排列,但在资深作者的经验中,重建缺陷并利用 Fisher 修复术进行修复,可带来美观的效果和不太明显的疤痕。收集了一个数据库,其中包括 2018 年 10 月至 2021 年 7 月在一家大型综合儿童医院进行的所有唇裂修复术。纳入标准包括由两名颅面外科医生进行的任何唇裂患者的唇裂修复术。收集的数据包括性别、唇裂特征、初次和指数修复时的年龄、初次修复类型、先前的修复术、任何额外组织重新排列的修复类型以及任何鼻部修复术。有 65 名患者纳入本研究进行分析。64 例(98%)已知初次修复类型,其中 54 例为 Millard 修复术(83%)。22 例(33%)在进行指数修复之前曾有过一次修复。60 例(92%)患者在指数修复时采用 Fisher 修复技术,46 例(70%)患者接受了鼻部修复。随访时,所有患者的唇部美学均得到改善。本研究表明,有很大一部分患者接受了 Fisher 技术的唇裂修复术。在资深外科医生的经验中,Fisher 修复技术在唇裂修复中是解决历史修复技术缺陷的理想方法。