Falasca Zamponi Alessio, Olson Jens, Scheel Sergej, Englund Anders, Scorza Raffaele, Tabrizi Fariborz
Capio Arytmicenter Stockholm AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Division of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec;67(9):1993-2001. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01846-3. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers a safe, non-thermal alternative for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, the pentaspline PFA-system relies heavily on fluoroscopy for catheter manipulation, which poses challenges due to the complexity of left atrium anatomy. Incorporating three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (3D-EAM) could improve procedural efficiency reducing dependency on fluoroscopy guidance. This study aims to evaluate the effects of integration of 3D-EAM with PFA during PVI.
Between September 2022 and December 2023, we retrospectively enrolled 248 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing PVI at our center using the pentaspline PFA catheter. The control group (n = 104) received conventional PFA with fluoroscopic guidance alone, while the intervention group (n = 144) underwent PVI with PFA with 3D-EAM integration. Primary outcomes were procedural time, fluoroscopy time (FT), and dose area product (DAP). Secondary endpoints included acute procedural success and incidence of periprocedural complications.
In the 3D-EAM-PFA group, procedural time was 63.3 ± 14.3 min, compared to 65.6 ± 14.9 min in the control group (p = 0.22). The 3D-EAM group experienced significantly reduced FT (9.7 ± 4.4 min vs. 16.7 ± 5.2 min) and DAP (119.2 ± 121.7 cGycm vs. 338.7 ± 229.9 cGycm) compared to the control group, respectively (p < 0.001). Acute procedural success was achieved in all cases. No major complications were observed in either group.
Integration of 3D-EAM with the pentaspline PFA catheter for PVI in AF treatment offers a promising approach, with significantly reduced fluoroscopy exposure without compromising procedural time and efficacy.
脉冲场消融(PFA)为心房颤动(AF)患者的肺静脉隔离(PVI)提供了一种安全的非热替代方法。目前,五边形PFA系统在很大程度上依赖荧光透视来进行导管操作,由于左心房解剖结构的复杂性,这带来了挑战。结合三维电解剖标测(3D-EAM)可以提高手术效率,减少对荧光透视引导的依赖。本研究旨在评估在PVI期间3D-EAM与PFA整合的效果。
在2022年9月至2023年12月期间,我们回顾性纳入了248例在我们中心使用五边形PFA导管进行PVI的阵发性或持续性AF患者。对照组(n = 104)仅接受荧光透视引导下的传统PFA,而干预组(n = 144)接受3D-EAM整合的PFA进行PVI。主要结局指标为手术时间、荧光透视时间(FT)和剂量面积乘积(DAP)。次要终点包括急性手术成功率和围手术期并发症发生率。
在3D-EAM-PFA组中,手术时间为63.3±14.3分钟,而对照组为65.6±14.9分钟(p = 0.22)。与对照组相比,3D-EAM组的FT(9.7±4.4分钟对16.7±5.2分钟)和DAP(119.2±121.7 cGycm对338.7±229.9 cGycm)均显著降低(p < 0.001)。所有病例均实现急性手术成功。两组均未观察到重大并发症。
将3D-EAM与五边形PFA导管整合用于AF治疗中的PVI提供了一种有前景的方法,可显著减少荧光透视暴露,同时不影响手术时间和疗效。