• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality of palliative and end-of-life care: a qualitative study of experts' recommendations to improve indicators in Quebec (Canada).姑息治疗和临终关怀的质量:对加拿大魁北克省改善指标的专家建议的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jun 10;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01474-8.
2
Quality of palliative and end-of-life care: a quantitative study of temporal trends and differences according to illness trajectories in Quebec (Canada).姑息治疗和临终关怀的质量:魁北克(加拿大)根据疾病轨迹的时间趋势和差异的定量研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 10;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01403-9.
3
Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK.城乡间获得临终关怀和生命终末期(PEoLC)机构和死亡地点的地理可达性的差异:英国英格兰全国性基于人群的研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 May 6;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12942-019-0172-1.
4
Working at the Intersection of Palliative End-of-Life and Mental Health Care: Provider Perspectives.在姑息性临终关怀与心理健康护理的交叉领域工作:提供者视角
J Palliat Care. 2022 Apr;37(2):183-189. doi: 10.1177/0825859720951360. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
Perspectives of Canadian health leaders on the relationship between medical assistance in dying and palliative and end-of-life care services: a qualitative study.加拿大卫生领导人对医疗辅助自杀与姑息治疗和临终关怀服务之间关系的看法:一项定性研究。
CMAJ. 2024 Feb 25;196(7):E222-E234. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231241.
6
Music therapy in UK palliative and end-of-life care: a service evaluation.英国姑息治疗和临终关怀中的音乐疗法:一项服务评估。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Sep;8(3):282-284. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001510. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
7
Measuring geographical accessibility to palliative and end of life (PEoLC) related facilities: a comparative study in an area with well-developed specialist palliative care (SPC) provision.衡量姑息治疗和临终关怀(PEoLC)相关设施的地理可达性:在专科姑息治疗(SPC)服务发达地区的一项比较研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jan 26;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0185-0.
8
Engaging Family Physicians in the Provision of Palliative and End-of-Life Care: Can We Do Better?让家庭医生参与提供姑息治疗和临终关怀:我们能否做得更好?
Palliat Med Rep. 2021 Jul 16;2(1):207-211. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0021. eCollection 2021.
9
Role of norms in variation in cancer centers' end-of-life quality: qualitative case study protocol.规范在癌症中心临终关怀质量变化中的作用:定性案例研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Aug 27;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00641-x.
10
Research participation in palliative medicine-benefits and barriers for patients and families: rapid review and thematic synthesis.参与姑息医学研究——患者及其家庭的获益与阻碍:快速综述与主题综合分析。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Mar;13(1):35-44. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003093. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that support home deaths for patients receiving at-home palliative and end-of-life care: a sequential mixed-methods explanatory study.支持接受居家姑息治疗和临终关怀患者在家中离世的因素:一项序贯混合方法解释性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 12;24(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01840-0.
2
Accessibility and Quality of Palliative Care-Experience in Primary Health Care.基层医疗保健中的姑息治疗可及性与质量:经验
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 25;61(1):9. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010009.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of palliative and end-of-life care: a quantitative study of temporal trends and differences according to illness trajectories in Quebec (Canada).姑息治疗和临终关怀的质量:魁北克(加拿大)根据疾病轨迹的时间趋势和差异的定量研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 10;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01403-9.
2
A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data.采用 interRAI 数据制定基于社区的姑息治疗质量指标的多阶段流程。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266569. eCollection 2022.
3
Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: bringing death back into life.《柳叶刀》死亡价值委员会报告:让死亡回归生命。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):837-884. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02314-X. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Systematic review of barriers and enablers to the delivery of palliative care by primary care practitioners.系统评价初级保健医生提供姑息治疗的障碍和促进因素。
Palliat Med. 2019 Oct;33(9):1131-1145. doi: 10.1177/0269216319865414.
5
"Just too busy living in the moment and surviving": barriers to accessing health care for structurally vulnerable populations at end-of-life.“只顾活在当下,勉强求生”:结构脆弱人群临终前获得医疗保健的障碍。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 26;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0396-7.
6
Understanding the Barriers to Introducing Early Palliative Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study.理解为晚期癌症患者引入早期姑息治疗的障碍:一项定性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 May;22(5):508-516. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0338. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
Can early palliative care with anticancer treatment improve overall survival and patient-related outcomes in advanced lung cancer patients? A review of the literature.早期姑息治疗联合抗癌治疗能否改善晚期肺癌患者的总生存期和患者相关结局?文献复习。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):2945-2953. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4184-3. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
8
National quality indicators and policies from 15 countries leading in adult end-of-life care: a systematic environmental scan.15个在成人临终关怀方面处于领先地位的国家的国家质量指标与政策:一项系统性的环境审视
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Jun;8(2):145-154. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001432. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
World Health Organization Public Health Model: A Roadmap for Palliative Care Development.世界卫生组织公共卫生模式:姑息治疗发展路线图。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2S):S6-S13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
10
Developing indicators of appropriate and inappropriate end-of-life care in people with Alzheimer's disease, cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for population-level administrative databases: A RAND/UCLA appropriateness study.为人群层面的行政数据库开发适用于阿尔茨海默病、癌症或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的适当和不适当临终关怀指标:一项 RAND/UCLA 适宜性研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;31(10):932-945. doi: 10.1177/0269216317705099. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

姑息治疗和临终关怀的质量:对加拿大魁北克省改善指标的专家建议的定性研究。

Quality of palliative and end-of-life care: a qualitative study of experts' recommendations to improve indicators in Quebec (Canada).

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, PO Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.

Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne (CRCLM), Campus de Longueuil - Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne - Bureau 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jun 10;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01474-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01474-8
PMID:38858720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11163802/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2021, the National Institute of Public Health (INSPQ) (Quebec, Canada), published an update of the palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) indicators. Using these updated indicators, this qualitative study aimed to explore the point of view of PEoLC experts on how to improve access and quality of care as well as policies surrounding end-of-life care.

METHODS

Semi-directed interviews were conducted with palliative care and policy experts, who were asked to share their interpretations on the updated indicators and their recommendations to improve PEoLC. A thematic analysis method was used.

RESULTS

The results highlight two categories of interpretations and recommendations pertaining to: (1) data and indicators and (2) clinical and organizational practice. Participants highlight the lack of reliability and quality of the data and indicators used by political and clinical stakeholders in evaluating PEoLC. To improve data and indicators, they recommend: improving the rigour and quality of collected data, assessing death percentages in all healthcare settings, promoting research on quality of care, comparing data to EOL care directives, assessing use of services in EOL, and creating an observatory on PEoLC. Participants also identified barriers and disparities in accessing PEoLC as well as inconsistency in quality of care. To improve PEoLC, they recommend: early identification of palliative care patients, improving training for all healthcare professionals, optimizing professional practice, integrating interdisciplinary teams, and developing awareness on access disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Results show that PEoLC is an important aspect of public health. Recommendations issued are relevant to improve PEoLC in and outside Quebec.

摘要

背景

2021 年,加拿大魁北克省国家公共卫生研究所(INSPQ)发布了姑息治疗和临终关怀(PEoLC)指标的更新版。本项使用这些更新指标的定性研究旨在探讨临终关怀专家如何改善临终关怀的可及性和服务质量以及相关政策的观点。

方法

对姑息治疗和政策专家进行了半结构化访谈,要求他们分享对更新指标的解释以及改善临终关怀的建议。使用了主题分析方法。

结果

结果突出了与以下两个类别的解释和建议相关的内容:(1)数据和指标;(2)临床和组织实践。参与者强调了政治和临床利益相关者在评估 PEoLC 时使用的数据和指标缺乏可靠性和质量。为了改进数据和指标,他们建议:提高收集数据的严谨性和质量,评估所有医疗保健环境中的死亡百分比,促进护理质量研究,将数据与临终关怀指令进行比较,评估临终关怀服务的使用情况,并创建一个临终关怀观察站。参与者还确定了临终关怀的可及性障碍和差距以及护理质量的不一致性。为了改善临终关怀,他们建议:早期识别姑息治疗患者,提高所有医疗保健专业人员的培训,优化专业实践,整合跨学科团队,并提高对可及性差距的认识。

结论

结果表明,PEoLC 是公共卫生的一个重要方面。提出的建议对于改善魁北克省内外的临终关怀服务具有相关性。