• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头部损伤评估和救护车诊断 (HOME) 研究方案:一项在院前环境中评估加拿大 CT 头部规则实施可行性的研究。

Head Injury Evaluation and Ambulance Diagnosis (HOME) Study protocol: a feasibility study assessing the implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule in the prehospital setting.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Department of Accidents and Trauma, Prince Sultan bin Abdelaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 11;14(6):e077191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077191.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077191
PMID:38862222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11168128/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common presentation in the prehospital environment. At present, paramedics do not routinely use tools to identify low-risk patients who could be left at scene or taken to a local hospital rather than a major trauma centre. The Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) was developed to guide the use of CT imaging in hospital. It has not been evaluated in the prehospital setting. We aim to address this gap by evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the CCHR to patients and paramedics, and the feasibility of conducting a full-scale clinical trial of its use.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will recruit adult patients who are being transported to an emergency department (ED) by ambulance after suffering a mild TBI. Paramedics will prospectively collect data for the CCHR. All patients will be transported to the ED, where deferred consent will be taken and the treating clinician will reassess the CCHR, blinded to paramedic interpretation. The primary clinical outcome will be neurosurgically significant TBI. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment and attrition rates. We will assess acceptability of the CCHR to paramedics using the Ottawa Acceptability of Decision Rules Instrument. Interobserver reliability of the CCHR will be assessed between paramedics and the treating clinician in the ED. Participating paramedics and patients will be invited to participate in semistructured interviews to explore the acceptability of trial processes and facilitators and barriers to the use of the CCHR in practice. Data will be analysed thematically. We anticipate recruiting approximately 100 patients over 6 months.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Health Research Authority and the Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 22/NW/0358). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at conferences and will be incorporated into a doctoral thesis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN92566288.

摘要

简介

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是院前环境中的常见表现。目前,护理人员通常不使用工具来识别低风险患者,这些患者可以留在现场或送往当地医院,而不是送往主要创伤中心。加拿大 CT 头部规则(CCHR)是为指导医院使用 CT 成像而制定的。它尚未在院前环境中进行评估。我们旨在通过评估将 CCHR 实施到患者和护理人员中的可行性和可接受性,以及对其使用进行全面临床试验的可行性来解决这一差距。

方法和分析

我们将招募因轻度 TBI 而被救护车送往急诊科(ED)的成年患者。护理人员将前瞻性地为 CCHR 收集数据。所有患者都将被送往 ED,在那里将获得延迟同意,并由主治临床医生对 CCHR 进行重新评估,对护理人员的解释进行盲法评估。主要临床结局将是神经外科显著 TBI。可行性结局包括招募率和失访率。我们将使用渥太华决策规则接受度工具评估 CCHR 对护理人员的可接受性。ED 中的护理人员和主治临床医生之间将评估 CCHR 的观察者间可靠性。将邀请参与的护理人员和患者参加半结构化访谈,以探讨试验过程的可接受性以及 CCHR 在实践中使用的促进因素和障碍。数据将进行主题分析。我们预计在 6 个月内招募约 100 名患者。

伦理和传播

这项研究得到了健康研究管理局和研究伦理委员会的批准(REC 参考:22/NW/0358)。结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,在会议上展示,并将纳入博士论文。

试验注册编号

ISRCTN92566288。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc5/11168128/551bd6cd2730/bmjopen-2023-077191f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc5/11168128/551bd6cd2730/bmjopen-2023-077191f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc5/11168128/551bd6cd2730/bmjopen-2023-077191f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Head Injury Evaluation and Ambulance Diagnosis (HOME) Study protocol: a feasibility study assessing the implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule in the prehospital setting.头部损伤评估和救护车诊断 (HOME) 研究方案:一项在院前环境中评估加拿大 CT 头部规则实施可行性的研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 11;14(6):e077191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077191.
2
Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury.加拿大头颅CT检查规则与新奥尔良标准在轻度头部损伤患者中的比较。
JAMA. 2005 Sep 28;294(12):1511-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.12.1511.
3
Evaluation of Glial and Neuronal Blood Biomarkers Compared With Clinical Decision Rules in Assessing the Need for Computed Tomography in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.胶质细胞和神经元血液生物标志物评估与临床决策规则在评估轻度创伤性脑损伤患者行计算机断层扫描的必要性中的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e221302. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1302.
4
Canadian CT head rule adherence in a rural hospital without in-house computed tomography.加拿大头部 CT 规则在没有院内 CT 情况下在农村医院的执行情况。
Can J Rural Med. 2024 Oct 1;29(4):167-172. doi: 10.4103/cjrm.cjrm_1_24. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
5
Performance of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for predicting any traumatic intracranial injury on computed tomography in a United States Level I trauma center.加拿大 CT 头规则和新奥尔良标准在美国一级创伤中心预测计算机断层扫描上任何创伤性颅内损伤的表现。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01247.x.
6
Accuracy of Canadian CT head rule in predicting positive findings on CT of the head of patients after mild head injury in a large trauma centre in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家大型创伤中心中,加拿大头颅CT规则在预测轻度颅脑损伤患者头颅CT阳性结果方面的准确性。
Neuroradiol J. 2015 Dec;28(6):591-7. doi: 10.1177/1971400915610699. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
7
External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury.加拿大头颅CT检查规则和新奥尔良标准在轻度头部损伤患者CT扫描中的外部验证。
JAMA. 2005 Sep 28;294(12):1519-25. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.12.1519.
8
Comparison of clinical performance of cranial computed tomography rules in patients with minor head injury: a multicenter prospective study.颅脑 CT 规则在轻型颅脑损伤患者临床应用中的比较:多中心前瞻性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;18(6):597-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01094.x.
9
Effect of clinical decision rules, patient cost and malpractice information on clinician brain CT image ordering: a randomized controlled trial.临床决策规则、患者费用和医疗事故信息对临床医生脑部 CT 图像检查申请的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Mar 12;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0602-1.
10
PRe-hospital Evaluation of Sensitive TrOponin (PRESTO) Study: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study protocol.PRESTO 研究:敏感肌钙蛋白的院前评估:多中心前瞻性诊断准确性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e032834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032834.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards exploring current challenges and future opportunities relating to the prehospital triage of patients with traumatic brain injury: a mixed-methods study protocol.旨在探索与创伤性脑损伤患者院前分诊相关的当前挑战和未来机遇:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 7;13(3):e068555. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068555.
2
Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Feasibility Pilot Studies.设计和评估可行性试点研究指南。
Med Care. 2022 Jan 1;60(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001664.
3
Rate of Intracranial Hemorrhage After Minor Head Injury.
轻度头部损伤后颅内出血的发生率。
Cureus. 2020 Sep 25;12(9):e10653. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10653.
4
The ethics of deferred consent in times of pandemics.大流行时期延迟同意的伦理问题。
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1328-1330. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0999-9.
5
Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine.应用四维标准评估急诊医学定性研究的严谨性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2.
6
Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis.欧洲创伤性脑损伤的流行病学:一项横断面分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2016 Dec;1(2):e76-e83. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30017-2. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
7
Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews.患者及公众参与临床试验设计:系统评价概述
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):240-253. doi: 10.1111/jep.12805. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
An exploration of patients' experiences of participation in a randomised controlled trial of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule.一项关于参与曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征(MACS)决策规则随机对照试验的患者体验的探索。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Sep;34(9):593-598. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206073. Epub 2017 May 12.
9
Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies.为高效随机对照试验提供信息:探索内部预试验进展标准制定中的挑战。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537.
10
AHEAD Study: an observational study of the management of anticoagulated patients who suffer head injury.AHEAD 研究:抗凝治疗患者头部损伤管理的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):e014324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014324.